Index › Products › ShareFile · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ShareFile

4Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ShareFile was named 1 time in Virtual data rooms, where iDeals led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business24 of 57

under the label threshold

Mid-market44 of 48

under the label threshold

Enterprise49 of 55

under the label threshold

In virtual data rooms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ShareFile for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Virtual data rooms	Equity and corporate	0%	44 of 48	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by iDeals at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ShareFile yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ShareFile across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ShareFile lacks basic VDR features, has limited support and no training provided, with security and usability challenges” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Virtual data rooms · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ShareFile, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ShareFile was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SecureDocs3 of 42Not among the top eight

Digify3 of 40Not among the top eight

Ellty2 of 41Not among the top eight

Firmex2 of 41Not among the top eight

Onehub2 of 40Not among the top eight

Box VDR1 of 40Not among the top eight

CapLinked1 of 40Not among the top eight

Datasite Diligence1 of 40Not among the top eight

DocSend1 of 40Not among the top eight

Dropbox DocSend1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ShareFile. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named ShareFile and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

papermark.com4

dataroom-providers.org3

ellty.com3

ethosdata.com3

peony.ink3

data-rooms.org2

dealroom.net2

digify.com2

fast.io2

firmex.com2

No domain is on file for ShareFile, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

dataroom-providers.org/3

papermark.com/blog/best-virtual-data-rooms3

dealroom.net/resources/virtual-data-room-providers-comparison2

digify.com/top-10-best-virtual-data-room-providers-2025-comparison.html2

ellty.com/blog/best-virtual-data-room-for-small-business2

ethosdata.com/blog/top-virtual-data-room-providers-in-2026-pricing-features-reviews-use-ca2

fast.io/resources/virtual-data-rooms-comparison2

learn.g2.com/best-virtual-data-room-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ShareFile

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ShareFile; a claim can dispute any of them.

ShareFile (Citrix) 1

Follow ShareFile

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ShareFile's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ShareFile, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ShareFile by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ShareFile is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ShareFile, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.