Every category where a model named Onehub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Virtual data rooms	Equity and corporate	0%	19 of 48	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Onehub yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Onehub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“OneHub (Best Pay-As-You-Go Option) ... excellent if you don't want to be locked into a subscription” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Virtual data rooms · budget prompt · alternative

“Best For: Smaller mid-sized companies (< $30M revenue) looking for cost-effective solutions.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Virtual data rooms · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Portal tiers at $12.50/user/month; Data Room Edition at $300/month flat.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Virtual data rooms · budget prompt · alternative

“$300/month flat (Data Room Edition) | Unlimited users, simple pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · Virtual data rooms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Onehub's interface and capabilities are inappropriate for complex, mission-critical projects” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Virtual data rooms · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Onehub, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Onehub was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SecureDocs20 of 255Not among the top eight

Peony Data Room15 of 2512Not among the top eight

Digify15 of 251Not among the top eight

Datasite Diligence14 of 251Not among the top eight

Intralinks14 of 251Not among the top eight

iDeals9 of 250Not among the top eight

Drooms8 of 250Not among the top eight

Firmex8 of 250Not among the top eight

Papermark7 of 252Not among the top eight

Ansarada7 of 250Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Onehub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 25 answers that named Onehub and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peony.ink20

ellty.com16

papermark.com14

firmroom.com13

fast.io12

clinked.com11

g2.com11

dataroom-providers.org9

data-rooms.org8

softwaretestinghelp.com8

No domain is on file for Onehub, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

peony.ink/blog/top-10-virtual-data-room-providers15

peony.ink/blog/affordable-virtual-data-rooms13

firmroom.com/vdr-providers12

clinked.com/virtual-data-room-providers11

fast.io/resources/virtual-data-room-providers11

ellty.com/blog/best-virtual-data-room-for-small-business9

g2.com/categories/virtual-data-room-vdr9

peony.ink/blog/best-data-room-for-small-business9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Onehub stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 5,400 a month (“onehub”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 51 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 19 of 48 in virtual data rooms

Segment leader

25%

iDeals

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 25 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Onehub

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Onehub; a claim can dispute any of them.

OneHub 1

Follow Onehub

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Onehub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Onehub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Onehub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Onehub is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Onehub, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.