AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Accounting and close › Account reconciliation › Numeric vs ReconArt
Account reconciliation · October 2026 Edition

Numeric vs ReconArt

Two of fourteen models named Numeric first on the direct prompt; zero named ReconArt. Numeric was named by twelve of the fourteen models and ReconArt by ten and Numeric carries 37 labels and ReconArt 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Numeric

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

ReconArt

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share10%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3716A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Numeric reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Trintech Adra was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. FloQast vs Numeric · FloQast vs ReconArt · Trintech Adra vs Numeric

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the account reconciliation page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
NumericFirst choices, of fourteen modelsReconArt
Direct20
Paraphrase21
Comparative01
Budget-constrained10
Scale-constrained00
Negative10
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Numeric and ReconArt stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Numeric ReconArt first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Numeric on the left and ReconArt on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Numeric and ReconArt stood in it.

Numeric first, ReconArt not the choice

2 of 14 modelsReconArt was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashFloQast, Numeric alternatives: Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Trintech Adra
Kimi K2FloQast, Numeric alternatives: Sage Intacct, Trintech Adra

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Trintech Adra alternatives: FloQast, Numeric, Prophix One
Gemini 3.5 FlashFloQast alternatives: BlackLine, Numeric, Trintech Adra, ZoneReconcile
Perplexity SonarTrintech Adra alternatives: Bluecopa, DOKKA, Numeric, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix One, ReconArt
Grok 4.1 FastFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Trintech Adra
DeepSeek V4 FlashFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Sage Intacct, Trintech Adra
MiniMax M2.5Trintech Adra, Xenett alternatives: Numeric, Sage Intacct, ZoneReconcile
GPT-6 LunaFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Trintech Adra

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniBlackLine alternatives: FloQast, Trintech Adra
Mistral SmallHighRadius alternatives: BlackLine, FloQast, Trintech
Llama 4 MaverickTrintech Adra alternatives: Oracle NetSuite, Ramp, Sage Intacct
GLM 4.7 FlashXFloQast, Trintech alternatives: BlackLine, HighRadius, Prophix One
Muse Glimmer 30BFloQast alternatives: Sage Intacct, Trintech Adra

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Numeric leads by five points.
Numeric5%#4 of 10
ReconArt0%#9 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Numeric leads by eight points.
Numeric10%#3 of 12
ReconArt2%#8 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Numeric leads by four points.
Numeric4%#6 of 10
ReconArt0%#10 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Numeric

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“prioritize tools with easy setup, AI matching, and compliance (e.g., for mid-market: Numeric or simpler options)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Numeric if you want modern AI-driven automation at a more accessible price point” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about ReconArt

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“If you need specialized, high-volume automation: Start with ReconArt at ~$300/month.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For large, complex, or high-volume reconciliations: ReconArt or BlackLine.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“a solid choice for medium to large businesses that need stronger reconciliation specialization” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.