Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 6 → 13 of 82
1 category · RankedReconArt
42Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Account reconciliation for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 82 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ReconArt →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 89
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market9 of 82
2%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise12 of 72
0%15 labels
accepted challenger
In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ReconArt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 2% | 9 of 82 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ReconArt held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Account reconciliation · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 16 → 9 of 77
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 13 → 10 of 66
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 9 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ReconArt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ReconArt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative17 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need specialized, high-volume automation: Start with ReconArt at ~$300/month.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Account reconciliation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For large, complex, or high-volume reconciliations: ReconArt or BlackLine.” Mistral Small · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · first choice
“a solid choice for medium to large businesses that need stronger reconciliation specialization” Perplexity Sonar · Account reconciliation · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Cited as strong for bank, account, and payment reconciliation with deep configuration” Perplexity Sonar · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ReconArt, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ReconArt was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ReconArt, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ReconArt was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ReconArt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 42 answers that named ReconArt and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
numeric.io31
prophix.com25
satvasolutions.com25
guideflow.com24
bluecopa.com22
relayfi.com19
highradius.com18
airwallex.com16
ramp.com15
g2.com12
207 of the 207 domain citations in answers naming ReconArt came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
reconart.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ReconArt takes 2% of first choices and FloQast takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
reconart.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ReconArt takes 2% of first choices and FloQast takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “reconciliation tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “account reconciliation software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“reconart”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 384 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 242 · 4 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 498
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 82 in account reconciliation
Segment leader
33%
FloQast
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 42 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 39 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on reconart.com
183
subdomains included
Content
150
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
10 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 104 | 4 | 2026-09-23 | Account reconciliation | |
| Case study | 40 | 0 | 2026-03-04 | Account reconciliation, Financial close manageme | |
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2025-03-25 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-234 ledger problem stablecoin payments blog
- 2026-08-24Reconciliation software buyers checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-09Travel industry reconciliation in 2026 blog
- 2026-08-09Ota reconciliation in travel agent vs principal accounting comparison
- 2026-07-14Implement reconciliation software reconart blog
- 2026-07-03Reconart solana agentic payments reconciliation blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page reconart.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as ReconArt
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ReconArt; a claim can dispute any of them.
Reconart 5
Follow ReconArt
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ReconArt is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ReconArt is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered financial reconciliation and close automation software built for modern finance teams. High-volume transaction matching, audit-ready controls, and automated workflows.
- For
- modern finance teams
- Price stated
- ReconArt is licensed by edition. Subscription and implementation costs are defined upfront. Edition-based licensing. One-time implementation. 60 or 80-hour package. No upgrade fees. reconart.com/plans
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27001:2013SSAE16PCI DSSISO27001HIPAAPrivacy Shield
- Hosting
- multiple global locationsGlobal platform
- Customers named
- MIDFLORIDA Credit UnionTransferGoFirst National Bankers BankBanco Unico (now Nedbank Mozambique)MFGCA Auto Finance UKMunro Footwear Group (MFG)Catalyst Corporate Federal Credit Union
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What ReconArt's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: reconart.com, reconart.com/plans, reconart.com/software-overview/security, reconart.com/solution, reconart.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ReconArt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ReconArt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ReconArt by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ReconArt is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ReconArt, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.