AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Accounting and close › Financial consolidation › Joiin vs Fathom
Financial consolidation · October 2026 Edition

Joiin vs Fathom

Zero of fourteen models named Joiin first on the direct prompt; zero named Fathom. Joiin was named by ten of the fourteen models and Fathom by nine and Joiin carries 15 labels and Fathom 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Joiin

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Fathom

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

First-choice share13%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1510A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Joiin reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Prophix was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Prophix vs Joiin · Prophix vs Fathom · Sage Intacct vs Joiin

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial consolidation page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
JoiinFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFathom
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained71
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Joiin and Fathom were named in the same answer thirty-six times, of the 67 answers naming Joiin and the 216 naming Fathom. In those answers Fathom took the first choice three times and Joiin eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Joiin and Fathom stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Joiin Fathom first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Joiin on the left and Fathom on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Joiin and Fathom stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Planful, Prophix alternatives: DOKKA, HighRadius, OneStream, Vena
GPT-5.4 miniOneStream alternatives: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix
Gemini 3.5 FlashProphix alternatives: Anaplan Financial Consolidation, Lucanet, Planful, Vena
Perplexity SonarProphix alternatives: Cube, HighRadius, Planful, Vena
Grok 4.1 FastProphix alternatives: Centage Planning Maestro, Planful, SoftLedger, Vena
Mistral SmallPlanful, Prophix alternatives: OneStream
DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, FloQast
Llama 4 MaverickProphix alternatives: Bluecopa, Cubesoftware, HighRadius
Qwen 3.7 FlashProphix alternatives: Cube, OneStream, Pigment, Vena
Kimi K2Fluence Technologies, Planful alternatives: Datarails, FloQast, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXProphix, Sage Intacct alternatives: Cube, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Planful
MiniMax M2.5Planful, Prophix alternatives: Fluence Technologies
GPT-6 LunaPlanful alternatives: Oracle NetSuite, Prophix, Vena
Muse Glimmer 30BProphix alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Fluence Technologies, Planful

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Joiin leads by thirty-nine points.
Joiin46%#1 of 14
Fathom7%#4 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Joiin leads by eleven points.
Joiin13%#4 of 12
Fathom2%#8 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Joiin leads by two points.
Joiin2%#– of 13
Fathom0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Joiin

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Joiin is the clear winner... Go with Joiin if you just want to get your consolidated P&L and Balance Sheet done quickly, accurately, and for the lowest price possible.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Joiin - Starting at $23/month, specifically designed for small businesses and advisors with multi-entity consolidation needs. Highly rated (4.7/5)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Joiin. It is purpose-built for multi-entity consolidation at the lowest price point” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fathom

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.