Financial consolidation for small business buyers
Asked as “financial consolidation software”, and as “multi-entity consolidation tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46Joiin08Centage Planning Maestro08Cube37others
46% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+17Since September 2026: 25% → 43%, +17 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Joiin held the lead, +17 points on 25%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Joiin46%Clear leader▲+17Since September 2026: 25% → 43%, +17 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-market
Prophix24%Contested▲+7Since September 2026: 19% → 26%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
OneStream63%Clear leader▼−16Since September 2026: 78% → 63%, −16 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Joiin46%Clear leader▲+17Since September 2026: 25% → 43%, +17 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketProphix24%Contested▲+7Since September 2026: 19% → 26%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseOneStream63%Clear leader▼−16Since September 2026: 78% → 63%, −16 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Joiin46%0%39endorsed leader▲+17Since September 2026: 25% → 43%, +17 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 43%
Joiin46%0%39endorsed leader▲+17Since September 2026: 25% → 43%, +17 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 43%02
Centage Planning Maestro8%4%25accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 9%
Centage Planning Maestro8%4%25accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 9%03
Cube8%5%22accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 7%
Cube8%5%22accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 7%04
Fathom7%0%30accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 14% → 7%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 7%
Fathom7%0%30accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 14% → 7%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 7%05
Datarails5%0%13accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 6%
Datarails5%0%13accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 6%06
Sage Intacct5%41%17criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
Sage Intacct5%41%17criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%07
QuickBooks Online3%44%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
QuickBooks Online3%44%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%08
LiveFlow2%0%14accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 2%
LiveFlow2%0%14accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 2%09
Vena2%33%12criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Vena2%33%12criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%10Prophix2%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Prophix2%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%11
Xero2%45%11criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Xero2%45%11criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Oracle Hyperion0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Oracle Hyperion0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14OneStream0%80%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
OneStream0%80%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Oracle NetSuite0%71%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Oracle NetSuite0%71%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Prophix vs Oracle NetSuiteProphix vs VenaProphix vs OneStreamProphix vs FathomSage Intacct vs PlanfulSage Intacct vs JoiinSage Intacct vs Oracle NetSuiteSage Intacct vs VenaSage Intacct vs OneStreamSage Intacct vs FathomPlanful vs JoiinPlanful vs Oracle NetSuitePlanful vs VenaPlanful vs OneStreamPlanful vs FathomJoiin vs Oracle NetSuiteJoiin vs VenaJoiin vs OneStreamJoiin vs FathomOracle NetSuite vs VenaOracle NetSuite vs OneStreamOracle NetSuite vs FathomVena vs OneStreamVena vs FathomOneStream vs Fathom
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Joiin46%
Joiin46%02Centage Planning Maestro8%
Centage Planning Maestro8%03Cube8%
Cube8%04Fathom7%
Fathom7%05Datarails5%
Datarails5%06Sage Intacct5%
Sage Intacct5%07QuickBooks Online3%
QuickBooks Online3%08LiveFlow2%
LiveFlow2%09Vena2%
Vena2%10Prophix2%
Prophix2%11Xero2%
Xero2%12Oracle NetSuite0%
Oracle NetSuite0%13Oracle Hyperion0%
Oracle Hyperion0%14OneStream0%
OneStream0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneStream80%
16 of 20 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“small businesses should avoid or be cautious about: - Enterprise-grade financial consolidation platforms (OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, NetSuite OneWorld, Sage Intacct)” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Oracle NetSuite71%
10 of 14 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Enterprise-Grade Financial Consolidation Software (e.g., NetSuite, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Consolidation...) - Why avoid or be cautious?” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Oracle Hyperion90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Enterprise-grade financial consolidation platforms (OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, NetSuite OneWorld, Sage Intacct)” Mistral Small, negative prompt
QuickBooks Online44%
7 of 16 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Who Should NOT Use QuickBooks Enterprise: Businesses that need full cloud-native infrastructure, multi-entity consolidated reporting, or full ERP capabilities” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1026 links across 258 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 23 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Prophix40 answers · 41 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Consolidate.io35 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
32 answers · 41 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware30 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow24 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · HighRadius24 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Datarails21 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sourceforge19 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · LiveFlow18 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
39 answers · 12 models
32 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial consolidation software”, “consolidation tools”, “financial consolidation software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joiin joiin.co | 46% | 67 | 590 | 4 | 152 | 0 | 6 | |
| Centage centage.com Centage Planning Maestro 8% | 8% | 38 | 1,000 | 11 | 1,692 company | 6 | ||
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 8% | 349 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | ||
| Fathom fathomhq.com | 7% | 204 | 90,500 | 6,657 | 74,881 | 38 | ||
| Datarails datarails.com | 5% | 303 | 6,600 | 134 | 18,964 | $16,697 | 107 | |
| Sage sage.com Sage Intacct 5% | 5% | 433 | 246,000 | 90,599 | 1,737,127 company | $114,671 | 78 | |
| QuickBooks quickbooks.ninja QuickBooks Online 3% | 3% | 621 | 1,000,000 | 54,681 | 253 company | |||
| Consolidate.io consolidate.io JustConsolidate 2%, Consolidate.io 2% | 3% | 5 | 3 | |||||
| LiveFlow liveflow.com | 2% | 95 | 1,300 | 19 | 94,846 | 4 | 4 | |
| Gather.nexus gather.nexus | 2% | 15 | 10 | 0 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (consolidate.io, highradius.com, liveflow.com). The first result for “best financial consolidation software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial consolidation software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-entity consolidation tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top consolidation tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial consolidation software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a financial consolidation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which consolidation tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Centage Planning MaestroQuickBooks OnlineChangedagainst: Oracle NetSuiteCubeJoiinagainst: Microsoft Excelno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena
Three alternatives
Datarails, Joiin, JustConsolidateTwo alternatives
Anaplan, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Datarails, FathomTwo alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, FathomGPT-5.4 miniDatarails, Joiinagainst: BlackLine, Board, CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseQuickBooks OnlineChangedMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Centralagainst: Oracle Hyperion Financial Close ManagementLiveFlowagainst: BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, OneStreamno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Oracle NetSuiteTwo alternatives
Board Financial Consolidation / Group Consolidation and Reporting, Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseTwo alternatives
Datarails, FloQastGemini 3.5 FlashJoiinagainst: Oracle, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, XeroJoiinHeldagainst: Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctFathomJoiinagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, VenaJoiin, JustConsolidateagainst: OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC
Three alternatives
Fathom, LiveFlow, Syft AnalyticsFour alternatives
Flow ERP, LiveFlow, SoftLedger, Syft AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Joiin, Syft AnalyticsThree alternatives
Fathom, G-Accon, Syft AnalyticsFive alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Fathom, LiveFlow, Syft AnalyticsPerplexity SonarCubeJoiinChangedCubeagainst: Board, Planful, Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningCubeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Joiin, Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
Cube, Gather.nexusThree alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Fathom, JoiinFour alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Fathom, QuickBooks Online Advanced with consolidation add-ons, Zoho Books with Zoho AnalyticsGrok 4.1 FastJoiinagainst: OneStream, ProphixJoiinHeldClickUp, NotionJoiinagainst: OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, Planfulno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperionagainst: AWS Glue, Alteryx, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Consolidation
Three alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Fathom, QuickBooks OnlineTwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage IntacctThree alternatives
Asana, Monday.com, TrelloThree alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Fathom, TallyPrimeMistral SmallCentage Planning Maestro, JoiinJoiinChangedCentage Planning Maestro, CubeCentage Planning Maestro, Cubeagainst: JustConsolidate, Qvincino first choiceagainst: OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct
Two alternatives
Cube, DatarailsTwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Model ReefOne alternative
DatarailsDeepSeek V4 FlashJoiinagainst: Lucanet, ProphixJoiinHeldagainst: Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctClickUpJoiinagainst: OneStream, Oracle, SAP, Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle, SAPagainst: CCH Tagetik, Manual Spreadsheet Consolidation, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct
Three alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Cube, ScaleXPOne alternative
FathomSix alternatives
Airtable, Asana, Basecamp, Monday.com, Notion, Zoho OneTwo alternatives
Fathom, ScaleXPSeven alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Fathom, Gather.nexus, Joiin, LiveFlow, Prophix, QuickConsolsLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceFathom, Gather.nexus, Sage IntacctChangedCentage Planning MaestroCentage Planning Maestrono first choicenothing named
One alternative
CubeOne alternative
LucanetQwen 3.7 FlashCube, Datarailsagainst: OneStream, Oracle, SAP BPCAcumatica Cloud ERP, Consolidate.ioChangedagainst: Oracle, SAPDatarailsJoiinagainst: Gravity Software, Oracle Hyperion, Sage IntacctCentage Planning Maestro, Fathomagainst: Oracle, Oracle NetSuite, Planful, SAP, Sage Intacct, Venaagainst: Microsoft Dynamics, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, SAP Business One, Xero
Three alternatives
Fathom, Joiin, ProphixOne alternative
QuickBooks OnlineTwo alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Flair AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, CubesKimi K2JoiinSage IntacctChangedno first choiceJoiinagainst: OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, Wave, WorkdayDatarails, Fathom, Joiin, Prophix, Spotlight Reporting, Venaagainst: OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuite, SAPnothing named
Two alternatives
Fathom, ScaleXPThree alternatives
Fathom, LiveFlow, QuickBooks OnlineTwo alternatives
Fathom, XeroThree alternatives
Board, Fluence Technologies, PlanfulGLM 4.7 FlashXFathomagainst: Sage IntacctJoiinChangedagainst: QuickBooks Online, XeroDatarails, JoiinJoiinagainst: Centage Planning Maestro, Wave, Zoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Tableau, Wave, Xero
Four alternatives
Flow ERP, Gather.nexus, LiveFlow, Syft AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Fathom, ScaleXPOne alternative
CubeSix alternatives
Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Power Query, QuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho BooksMiniMax M2.5Fuelfinance, Sage IntacctJoiinChangedno first choiceJoiin, Xerono first choiceagainst: FreshBooks, GnuCash, Manager.io, QuickBooks Online, Wave
One alternative
VenaFour alternatives
Fathom, Fuelfinance, LiveFlow, Spotlight ReportingOne alternative
WaveGPT-6 LunaJoiinJoiinHeldFathom, Joiinagainst: CubeJoiinno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
Intuit Enterprise Suite, Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
Intuit Enterprise Suite, Syft AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Intuit Enterprise Suite, Sage IntacctMuse Glimmer 30BCubeno first choiceChangedLiveFlowJoiinagainst: Board, OneStream, Planfulno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, QuickBooks Online, Trintech Cadency, Xero
Two alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, FathomThree alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Fathom, JoiinTwo alternatives
Cube, FathomBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 2 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 22 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:40 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:09 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 16 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:24 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 17 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 19 | 73 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 13 | 61 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 25 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 23 | 77 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 22 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 19 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:06 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:53 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 32 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 12 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:57 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 17 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:49 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 2 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:39 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 13 | 102 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica read as Acumatica Cloud ERP
Centage read as Centage Planning Maestro
Centage (Planning Maestro) read as Centage Planning Maestro
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Fluence read as Fluence Technologies
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle FCCS read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Prophix One read as Prophix
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Advanced read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Enterprise read as QuickBooks Online
SAP Group Reporting read as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Board Financial Consolidation / Group Consolidation and Reporting
Cubes
Flair Analytics
Keboola
Manual Spreadsheet Consolidation (Excel/Google Sheets)
Model Reef
QuickBooks Online Advanced with consolidation add-ons
QuickBooks multi-company
QuickConsols
SAP Consolidation
Troop Messenger / Microsoft 365
Xero HQ
Zoho Books with Zoho Analytics
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.