Financial consolidation · October 2026 Edition
Prophix vs Sage Intacct
Eleven of fourteen models named Prophix first on the direct prompt; one named Sage Intacct. Prophix was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Sage Intacct by thirteen and Prophix carries 34 labels and Sage Intacct 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Named in nineteen categories this edition.
First-choice share24%16%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%21%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3419A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Prophix reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Planful was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Prophix vs Planful · Prophix vs Joiin · Prophix vs Oracle NetSuite
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial consolidation page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ProphixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSage Intacct
Direct111
Paraphrase181 against Sage Intacct
Comparative00
Budget-constrained003 against Sage Intacct
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Prophix and Sage Intacct stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Prophix Sage Intacct first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Prophix on the left and Sage Intacct on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Prophix and Sage Intacct stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.GLM 4.7 FlashXProphix, Sage Intacct alternatives: Cube, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, Planful
Prophix first, Sage Intacct not the choice
10 of 14 modelsSage Intacct was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Planful, Prophix alternatives: DOKKA, HighRadius, OneStream, Vena
Gemini 3.5 FlashProphix alternatives: Anaplan Financial Consolidation, Lucanet, Planful, Vena
Perplexity SonarProphix alternatives: Cube, HighRadius, Planful, Vena
Grok 4.1 FastProphix alternatives: Centage Planning Maestro, Planful, SoftLedger, Vena
Mistral SmallPlanful, Prophix alternatives: OneStream
DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, FloQast
Llama 4 MaverickProphix alternatives: Bluecopa, Cubesoftware, HighRadius
Qwen 3.7 FlashProphix alternatives: Cube, OneStream, Pigment, Vena
MiniMax M2.5Planful, Prophix alternatives: Fluence Technologies
Muse Glimmer 30BProphix alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Fluence Technologies, Planful
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniOneStream alternatives: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix
GPT-6 LunaPlanful alternatives: Oracle NetSuite, Prophix, Vena
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Kimi K2Fluence Technologies, Planful alternatives: Datarails, FloQast, Vena
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Sage Intacct leads by three points.
Sage Intacct5%#6 of 14Prophix2%#10 of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Prophix leads at mid-market.
Prophix24%#1 of 12Sage Intacct16%#2 of 12Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Prophix0%#12 of 13Sage Intacct0%#9 of 13What the models said about Prophix
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Prophix is an FP&A platform provider geared mainly towards mid-market companies that automates budgeting, forecasting, and financial consolidation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Prophix One is positioned as "Best for mid-market consolidation tied to planning and close" and is described as leading the mid-market segment” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for: Integrated consolidation, close, and FP&A on a single platform... Prophix is an incredibly cohesive solution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Sage Intacct
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Starts around $12,000/year (single user) with implementation costs of $5K $50K” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid big-suite tools like Planful or Sage Intacct” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
Also compared
Prophix vs PlanfulProphix vs JoiinProphix vs Oracle NetSuiteProphix vs VenaProphix vs OneStreamProphix vs FathomSage Intacct vs PlanfulSage Intacct vs JoiinSage Intacct vs Oracle NetSuiteSage Intacct vs VenaSage Intacct vs OneStreamSage Intacct vs FathomAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full financial consolidation standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.