Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 8 → 15 of 96
9 categories · RankedProphix
244Judge labels
34First choices
29Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
9Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
24% in Financial consolidation for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 102 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
11 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 34 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Prophix →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business16 of 100
2%10 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 102
24%34 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise18 of 82
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Prophix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 24% | 1 of 102 | 0% | 34 | accepted challenger | ▲+7Since September 2026: 19% → 26%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 17% | 2 of 99 | 3% | 39 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 6% | 7 of 77 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 4% | 4 of 85 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 2% | 15 of 99 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 19 of 74 | 8% | 26 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 21 of 105 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| ESG and carbon reporting | Equity and corporate | 0% | 87 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Greenly at 36% | |
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 84 of 107 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Prophix held within the floor in all nine categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial consolidation · by segment
Mid-market▲+7Since September 2026: 19% → 26%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
26%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 of 99, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 11 → 17 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial modeling | 0% | 7% | ▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 7 of 77 |
| Financial consolidation | 19% | 26% | ▲+7Since September 2026: 19% → 26%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 102, unchanged |
| FP&A platforms | 6% | 0% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 19 of 74 |
| Corporate performance ma | 12% | 17% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 2 of 99 |
| Board | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 78 → 15 of 99 |
| Financial close manageme | 5% | 4% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 4 of 85 |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 21 of 105 |
| ESG and carbon reporting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 87 of 110, unchanged |
| Fixed asset accounting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 84 of 107, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Prophix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Prophix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 16 |
| Mistral Small | 5 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 4 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 11 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 15 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct73 labels18
Paraphrase34 labels9
Comparative49 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels3
Scale-constrained42 labels4
Negative26 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative244 labels in all, every segment counted; 34 of the 37 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Prophix is an FP&A platform provider geared mainly towards mid-market companies that automates budgeting, forecasting, and financial consolidation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · first choice
“Prophix One is positioned as "Best for mid-market consolidation tied to planning and close" and is described as leading the mid-market segment” Muse Glimmer 30B · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · first choice
“Prophix is the strongest overall EPM option in these results because it is specifically described as a low-cost entry” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for: Integrated consolidation, close, and FP&A on a single platform... Prophix is an incredibly cohesive solution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid or be extremely cautious with Anaplan, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning...” GLM 4.7 FlashX · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Prophix, Oracle Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud: Full-featured, complex” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial modeling · scale prompt · soft negative
“easy to roll out and maintain but "doesn't allow for deep customization."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Slow performance... Steep learning curve... Complex initial setup” Kimi K2 · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Prophix, over the 244 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prophix was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Prophix, over the 244 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prophix was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prophix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 237 of the 244 answers that named Prophix and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
prophix.comYour site137
learn.g2.com87
cubesoftware.com82
drivetrain.ai80
g2.com68
guideflow.com64
datarails.com57
highradius.com49
softwaresuggest.com49
golimelight.com43
579 of the 716 domain citations in answers naming Prophix came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Prophix stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Prophix stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consolidation tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial consolidation software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“prophix”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 41 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 14,138 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,520 · 206 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,728
- Paid Google search
- 4 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $109 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
24%
rank 1 of 102 in financial consolidation
First choices
34
across its categories
- Named in
- 244 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 237 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on prophix.com
2,911
subdomains included
Content
965
counted in the table below
Documentation
162
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 749 | 0 | 2023-05-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 135 | undated | |||
| News or press | 42 | 0 | 2023-03-07 | ||
| Comparison | 25 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 3 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-02-04 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Webinar replay september 2026 construction meetup 8NGRjpibrLmTcs1 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-17Webinar replay ai prompt building best practices workshop szqN6RvpxVCp7GA webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-04Cews july webinar recording troubleshooting tips to get ahead of budget dEiKTCcyZmuLfpG webinar or virtual event
- 2026-06-24Senior living user group 23 june 2026 webinar recording N5D3YrDFnhBQtU3 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-02-04Prophix year end rollover admin checklist piliGGHqIT6cV2X template or tool
- 2023-05-18Prophix versus excel a side by side comparison blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page prophix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Prophix
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Prophix; a claim can dispute any of them.
Prophix One 32Prophix (Prophix One) 1Prophix (now "Prophix One") 1Prophix One (by Dassault Systèmes) 1
Follow Prophix
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Prophix is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Prophix is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered finance for mid-market complexity
- For
- mid-market
- Certifications
- TRUSTeindustry-leading certifications
- Customers named
- UpfSkanskaMission HealthSammons FinancialKBD Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Prophix's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: prophix.com, trust.prophix.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prophix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prophix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Prophix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Prophix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Prophix, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Prophix is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Prophix is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideFinancial consolidation
AI models recommend Prophix first in Financial consolidation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Corporate performance management
Prophix is among the products AI models recommend first in Corporate performance management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.