FinQuery vs Trullion
Seven of fourteen models named FinQuery first on the direct prompt; zero named Trullion. FinQuery was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Trullion by eleven and FinQuery carries 56 labels and Trullion 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the lease accounting page.
By framing
FinQueryFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTrullion
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, FinQuery and Trullion were named in the same answer thirty-five times, of the 134 answers naming FinQuery and the 81 naming Trullion. In those answers Trullion took the first choice one time and FinQuery sixteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
FinQuery Trullion first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, FinQuery on the left and Trullion on the right.The direct prompt
FinQuery first, Trullion an alternative
7 of 14 modelsTrullion was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
FinQuery7%#5 of 10Trullion2%#– of 10FinQuery29%#1 of 13Trullion2%#8 of 13What the models said about FinQuery
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise solutions like Visual Lease or LeaseQuery if you're on a limited budget” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like LeaseQuery Advanced or Visual Lease” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Overly rigid tools like certain configurations of LeaseQuery (FinQuery): High ratings overall (4.6/5), but watch for reviews mentioning irreversible changes, steep learning curves” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“FinQuery is one of the most widely used and highly rated lease accounting platforms for mid-sized companies... handles both ASC 842 and IFRS 16 effortlessly” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The top lease accounting tools are typically FinQuery (LeaseQuery)... Strong general-purpose compliance platform with wide standards support” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most mid‑market B2B companies: Start with FinQuery (LeaseQuery) for its balance of power, multi‑standard support, and mid‑market pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Trullion
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Trullion and iLeasePro are the most popular and user-friendly options” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.