Lease accounting · October 2026 Edition
FinQuery vs Visual Lease
Seven of fourteen models named FinQuery first on the direct prompt; zero named Visual Lease. FinQuery was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Visual Lease by thirteen and FinQuery carries 56 labels and Visual Lease 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share29%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5636A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, FinQuery reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.iLeasePro was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. FinQuery vs EZLease · FinQuery vs iLeasePro · FinQuery vs LeaseGuru
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the lease accounting page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FinQueryFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVisual Lease
Direct70
Paraphrase61
Comparative91
Budget-constrained005 against FinQuery · 4 against Visual Lease
Scale-constrained21
Negative006 against FinQuery · 2 against Visual Lease
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, FinQuery and Visual Lease were named in the same answer eighty times, of the 134 answers naming FinQuery and the 107 naming Visual Lease. In those answers Visual Lease took the first choice nine times and FinQuery twenty-two.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where FinQuery and Visual Lease stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
FinQuery Visual Lease first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, FinQuery on the left and Visual Lease on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where FinQuery and Visual Lease stood in it.
FinQuery first, Visual Lease an alternative
7 of 14 modelsVisual Lease was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniFinQuery alternatives: EZLease, Nakisa Lease Administration
Gemini 3.5 FlashFinQuery alternatives: Crunchafi, NetLease, SOFT4Lessee, Trullion, Visual Lease
Perplexity SonarFinQuery alternatives: Trullion, Visual Lease, iLeasePro
Grok 4.1 FastFinQuery alternatives: LeaseCrunch, Visual Lease
Kimi K2FinQuery alternatives: EZLease, Occupier, Sage Intacct, iLeasePro
GLM 4.7 FlashXFinQuery alternatives: Lease Insight, LeaseAccelerator, MRI ProLease, iLeasePro
MiniMax M2.5FinQuery, iLeasePro alternatives: LeaseCalcs, Occupier, Spacebase
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5SOFT4Lessee alternatives: EZLease, FinQuery, Spacebase
Mistral SmalliLeasePro alternatives: FinQuery, Prophix One Lease Accounting, Spacebase
DeepSeek V4 FlashLeaseCrunch alternatives: EZLease, FinQuery, Sage Intacct, Visual Lease
Llama 4 MaverickLeasecake alternatives: FinQuery, Visual Lease, iLeasePro
Qwen 3.7 FlashiLeasePro alternatives: FinQuery, LeaseWave, Trullion
GPT-6 LunaFinQuery's LeaseQuery alternatives: Occupier, Visual Lease
Muse Glimmer 30BFinQuery, formerly LeaseQuery alternatives: MRI ProLease, SOFT4Lessee, Visual Lease, iLeasePro
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
FinQuery leads by seven points.
FinQuery7%#5 of 10Visual Lease0%#10 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
FinQuery leads by twenty-five points.
FinQuery29%#1 of 13Visual Lease4%#5 of 13Enterprise
FinQuery leads by eight points.
FinQuery20%#2 of 10Visual Lease12%#3 of 10What the models said about FinQuery
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise solutions like Visual Lease or LeaseQuery if you're on a limited budget” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like LeaseQuery Advanced or Visual Lease” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Overly rigid tools like certain configurations of LeaseQuery (FinQuery): High ratings overall (4.6/5), but watch for reviews mentioning irreversible changes, steep learning curves” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“FinQuery is one of the most widely used and highly rated lease accounting platforms for mid-sized companies... handles both ASC 842 and IFRS 16 effortlessly” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The top lease accounting tools are typically FinQuery (LeaseQuery)... Strong general-purpose compliance platform with wide standards support” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most mid‑market B2B companies: Start with FinQuery (LeaseQuery) for its balance of power, multi‑standard support, and mid‑market pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Visual Lease
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise solutions like Visual Lease or LeaseQuery if you're on a limited budget” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like LeaseQuery Advanced or Visual Lease” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Modification entries can post to accounting feeds without review prompts, meaning an incorrect entry can affect live financial data before it is caught.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Excellent for cross-departmental collaboration between finance, real estate, legal, and IT teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“| Visual Lease | ERP integrations, mid-to-large portfolios |” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“🏆 Top Recommendation: Visual Lease” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
FinQuery vs EZLeaseFinQuery vs iLeaseProFinQuery vs LeaseGuruFinQuery vs CrunchafiFinQuery vs LeaseCrunchFinQuery vs TrullionEZLease vs Visual LeaseiLeasePro vs Visual LeaseLeaseGuru vs Visual LeaseVisual Lease vs CrunchafiVisual Lease vs LeaseCrunchVisual Lease vs TrullionAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full lease accounting standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.