| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 29% | 1 of 71 | 20% | 56 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 36% → 33%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | 36% | 33% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 36% → 33%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 71, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“FinQuery is one of the most widely used and highly rated lease accounting platforms for mid-sized companies... handles both ASC 842 and IFRS 16 effortlessly” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The top lease accounting tools are typically FinQuery (LeaseQuery)... Strong general-purpose compliance platform with wide standards support” Perplexity Sonar · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most mid‑market B2B companies: Start with FinQuery (LeaseQuery) for its balance of power, multi‑standard support, and mid‑market pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“1. FinQuery (formerly LeaseQuery) ... Focuses on automation and audit readiness, with strong support for complex reporting requirements.” Mistral Small · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid enterprise solutions like Visual Lease or LeaseQuery if you're on a limited budget” Kimi K2 · Lease accounting · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like LeaseQuery Advanced or Visual Lease” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lease accounting · budget prompt · hard negative
“Overly rigid tools like certain configurations of LeaseQuery (FinQuery): High ratings overall (4.6/5), but watch for reviews mentioning irreversible changes, steep learning curves” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve for non-accountants; editing approved leases is "friction-filled" with forced re-approval workflows; report lag under heavy load” Kimi K2 · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 133 of the 134 answers that named FinQuery and are not a share of its labels.
546 of the 627 domain citations in answers naming FinQuery came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 350 | 11 | 2026-09-03 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| News or press | 109 | 3 | 2026-09-08 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Podcast or video | 44 | 0 | 2024-04-12 | ||
| Case study | 34 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 30 | 2 | 2026-09-10 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Comparison | 28 | 1 | 2026-08-07 | Lease accounting, Expense management | |
| Template or tool | 26 | 0 | 2026-01-13 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Conference or event | 12 | 0 | 2025-06-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2023-10-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page finquery.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What FinQuery's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: finquery.com, finquery.com/products, finquery.com/case-studies, finquery.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FinQuery's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FinQuery, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FinQuery by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend FinQuery first in Lease accounting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.