AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Equity and corporate › Board portals › BoardPro vs Govenda
Board portals · October 2026 Edition

BoardPro vs Govenda

Zero of fourteen models named BoardPro first on the direct prompt; one named Govenda. BoardPro was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Govenda by nine and BoardPro carries 32 labels and Govenda 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

BoardPro

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Govenda

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3216A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, BoardPro reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. OnBoard vs BoardPro · OnBoard vs Govenda · Boardable vs BoardPro

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board portals page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BoardProFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGovenda
Direct01
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained202 against BoardPro
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, BoardPro and Govenda were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 180 answers naming BoardPro and the 59 naming Govenda. In those answers Govenda took the first choice two times and BoardPro six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where BoardPro and Govenda stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
BoardPro Govenda first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BoardPro on the left and Govenda on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where BoardPro and Govenda stood in it.

Govenda first, BoardPro not the choice

1 of 14 modelsBoardPro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2Govenda, OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Boardable, Diligent Boards
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Boardable, Govenda
Grok 4.1 FastOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Govenda
Mistral SmallOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, BoardPro, Govenda
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Diligent Boards, Govenda
GLM 4.7 FlashXOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, BoardEffect, Govenda

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Azeus Convene, Diligent Boards
Gemini 3.5 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Llama 4 MaverickOnBoard
Qwen 3.7 FlashAprio Board Portal alternatives: AppDeck, OnBoard
MiniMax M2.5Aprio Board Portal, OnBoard
GPT-6 LunaOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BoardPro leads by fifty-four points.
BoardPro54%#1 of 8
Govenda0%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
BoardPro leads by four points.
BoardPro6%#3 of 10
Govenda2%#5 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Govenda leads at enterprise.
Govenda9%#3 of 10
BoardPro6%#4 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about BoardPro

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Cheaper and better-rated for small users than competitors like BoardPro ($165+/month per board, flat rate but higher entry)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“still relatively affordable but less budget-focused than Boardable” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“If you have a large board (12+ members): Go with BoardPro. Its flat-rate "per board" pricing model with unlimited users will save you a fortune” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For a small company board, I'd start with BoardPro Essentials if you have 7 or more people who need access.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Govenda

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Start with OnBoard or Govenda — both are purpose-built for mid-market B2B companies” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Govenda is a secure, cloud-based platform recognized for a user-friendly interface, strong security certifications” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.