Small business▲+8Since September 2026: 20% → 29%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
29%from 20% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 3 → 1 of 104
2 categories · RankedBoardPro
180Judge labels
57First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
54% in Board portals for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 99 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of BoardPro →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 109
29%44 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 99
9%21 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 100
5%10 labels
accepted challenger
In board · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named BoardPro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 9% | 4 of 99 | 5% | 21 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Board portals | Equity and corporate | 6% | 3 of 50 | 6% | 32 | accepted challenger |
Movement
Since September 2026, BoardPro held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Board · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 4 of 95
Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 9 → 5 of 95
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board portals | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 3 of 50, unchanged |
| Board | 7% | 8% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 4 of 99 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated BoardPro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated BoardPro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct32 labels19
Paraphrase22 labels11
Comparative31 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained57 labels22
Scale-constrained14 labels5
Negative24 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative180 labels in all, every segment counted; 57 of the 72 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you have a large board (12+ members): Go with BoardPro. Its flat-rate "per board" pricing model with unlimited users will save you a fortune” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board portals · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with BoardPaq or BoardPro, depending on whether you prefer ... a flat per-board rate with unlimited users” Kimi K2 · Board · budget prompt · first choice
“For a small company board, I'd start with BoardPro Essentials if you have 7 or more people who need access.” GPT-6 Luna · Board portals · budget prompt · first choice
“BoardPro (Best Overall Flat-Rate for SMEs & Nonprofits) ... BoardPro is highly recommended” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Cheaper and better-rated for small users than competitors like BoardPro ($165+/month per board, flat rate but higher entry)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Board portals · budget prompt · soft negative
“Does not appear to permit requiring MFA for all users, creating a security gap” Kimi K2 · Board · negative prompt · soft negative
“still relatively affordable but less budget-focused than Boardable” Perplexity Sonar · Board portals · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BoardPro, over the 180 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BoardPro was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BoardPro, over the 180 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BoardPro was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BoardPro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 179 of the 180 answers that named BoardPro and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
fast.io119
guideflow.com119
appdeck.com102
capterra.com97
g2.com96
boardintelligence.com68
boardpro.comYour site59
board-room.org52
onboardmeetings.com52
getapp.com48
753 of the 812 domain citations in answers naming BoardPro came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
boardpro.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BoardPro takes 9% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
boardpro.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BoardPro takes 9% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “board reporting tools”
9
Position for “board reporting software”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“boardpro”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 20 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,012 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,679 · 84 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,039
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
9%
rank 4 of 99 in board
Segment leader
26%
OnBoard
- First choices
- 57 across its categories
- Named in
- 180 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 179 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on boardpro.com
727
subdomains included
Content
605
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
23 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 348 | 0 | 2022-07-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 177 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 42 | undated | |||
| Case study | 24 | 0 | 2022-08-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2021-06-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2022-08-19Surf life saving nsw case study
- 2022-07-21How to write a board code of conduct blog
- 2022-07-21Institute of community directors australia and boardpro partnership blog
- 2022-07-21Seamlessly transition to a new board chair blog
- 2022-07-21How to align your governance strategy and your organisation blog
- 2022-07-21Cognitive biases in board decision making blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page boardpro.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as BoardPro
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BoardPro; a claim can dispute any of them.
BoardPro Essentials 2
Follow BoardPro
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
BoardPro is its own company.ShowHide
The company
BoardPro is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Board management software built for SMEs & Nonprofits.
- For
- SMEs & Nonprofits
- Price stated
- $150 USD boardpro.com
- Starting price
- 150 boardpro.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free for 30 days. No credit card required. boardpro.com
- Certifications
- SSAE-16 SOC 1, 2 and 3ISO 27001
- Hosting
- Australasian datacentresAustraliaANZNew South Wales AustraliaVictoria
- Customers named
- Karma DrinksSurf Life Saving NSWTuia WaitakereHamilton Boys High SchoolFarro FreshPeopleKind GroupBaygoldSoftball New Zealand
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What BoardPro's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: boardpro.com, boardpro.com/pricing, boardpro.com/security, boardpro.com/solutions/smes, boardpro.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BoardPro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BoardPro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BoardPro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where BoardPro is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name BoardPro, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where BoardPro is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where BoardPro is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideBoardPro is among the products AI models recommend first in Board portals this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.