AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Equity and corporate › Board portals › Nasdaq Boardvantage vs Azeus Convene
Board portals · October 2026 Edition

Nasdaq Boardvantage vs Azeus Convene

Zero of fourteen models named Nasdaq Boardvantage first on the direct prompt; zero named Azeus Convene. Nasdaq Boardvantage was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Azeus Convene by eleven and Nasdaq Boardvantage carries 28 labels and Azeus Convene 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Nasdaq Boardvantage

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Azeus Convene

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate29%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels2818A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Nasdaq Boardvantage reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. OnBoard vs Nasdaq Boardvantage · OnBoard vs Azeus Convene · Boardable vs Nasdaq Boardvantage

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board portals page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Nasdaq BoardvantageFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAzeus Convene
Direct001 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Paraphrase112 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Comparative401 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained001 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Negative003 against Nasdaq Boardvantage · 2 against Azeus Convene
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Nasdaq Boardvantage and Azeus Convene were named in the same answer fifty-three times, of the 203 answers naming Nasdaq Boardvantage and the 71 naming Azeus Convene. In those answers Azeus Convene took the first choice one time and Nasdaq Boardvantage ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Nasdaq Boardvantage and Azeus Convene stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Nasdaq Boardvantage Azeus Convene first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Nasdaq Boardvantage on the left and Azeus Convene on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Nasdaq Boardvantage and Azeus Convene stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Azeus Convene, Diligent Boards
Gemini 3.5 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Boardable, Diligent Boards
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Boardable, Govenda
Grok 4.1 FastOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Govenda
Mistral SmallOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, BoardPro, Govenda
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Diligent Boards, Govenda
Llama 4 MaverickOnBoard
Qwen 3.7 FlashAprio Board Portal alternatives: AppDeck, OnBoard
Kimi K2Govenda, OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal
GLM 4.7 FlashXOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro
MiniMax M2.5Aprio Board Portal, OnBoard
GPT-6 LunaOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, BoardEffect, Govenda

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Nasdaq Boardvantage0%#7 of 8
Azeus Convene0%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Nasdaq Boardvantage2%#7 of 10
Azeus Convene2%#8 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Nasdaq Boardvantage leads by nineteen points.
Nasdaq Boardvantage19%#2 of 10
Azeus Convene0%#8 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Nasdaq Boardvantage

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“Enterprise-grade pricing (~$20K–40K+/year) — designed for regulated public companies” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“avoiding the excessive price tags and bloated complexity of legacy enterprise portals built for massive public corporations (like Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Public/enterprise companies → Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (premium, security-first, enterprise scale)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“choose Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage for large, regulated enterprises needing deep compliance and analytics” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“For enterprise-scale governance, start with Diligent Boards and Nasdaq Boardvantage.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Azeus Convene

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“Poor support (e.g., long waits, no 24/7 help—Nasdaq at 62% rating, Azeus Convene at 66%)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“some users report limitations in functionality compared to competitors” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“I recommend OnBoard or Convene, as they offer the best balance of modern user experience, governance features, and scalable pricing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Pick Convene if you need deployment/device flexibility.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
“a good option if you have international considerations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.