2 categories · RankedNasdaq Boardvantage
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board portals | Equity and corporate | 2% | 8 of 50 | 29% | 28 | criticized challenger | |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 20 of 99 | 35% | 23 | criticized challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Nasdaq Boardvantage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Public/enterprise companies → Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (premium, security-first, enterprise scale)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board portals · comparative prompt · first choice
“choose Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage for large, regulated enterprises needing deep compliance and analytics” Muse Glimmer 30B · Board portals · comparative prompt · first choice
“For enterprise-scale governance, start with Diligent Boards and Nasdaq Boardvantage.” GPT-6 Luna · Board portals · comparative prompt · first choice
“Nasdaq Boardvantage (G2: 4.6/5, ~220 reviews) – Best for compliance-heavy enterprises.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Board · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise-grade pricing (~$20K–40K+/year) — designed for regulated public companies” Kimi K2 · Board portals · direct prompt · hard negative
“legacy portals (including older, highly customized builds of massive systems like Nasdaq Boardvantage or older iterations of Diligent) that prioritize rigid administrative features over user experience” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · negative prompt · soft negative
“such as Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage) may be overkill for startups or smaller organizations. These platforms often come with enterprise-level bloat, high costs, and steep learning curves” Mistral Small · Board · negative prompt · soft negative
“avoiding the excessive price tags and bloated complexity of legacy enterprise portals built for massive public corporations (like Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board portals · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nasdaq Boardvantage, over the 203 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nasdaq Boardvantage was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 198 of the 203 answers that named Nasdaq Boardvantage and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
825 of the 886 domain citations in answers naming Nasdaq Boardvantage came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
nasdaq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nasdaq Boardvantage takes 2% of first choices and OnBoard takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“nasdaq boardvantage”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 16 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 21,233,250 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 412,440 · 45,198 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 133,879
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 13 clicks and $57 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 18 across its categories
- Named in
- 203 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 198 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 11 | 6 | 2026-09-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Bigwire report or ebook
- 2026-09-28Powershares etf report report or ebook
- 2026-09-24Franklin libertyshares etf report report or ebook
- 2026-09-24Ishares weekly equity models report report or ebook
- 2026-09-23First trust report report or ebook
- 2026-09-08Kraneshares etf report report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page nasdaq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Nasdaq Boardvantage
Follow Nasdaq Boardvantage
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Nasdaq Boardvantage is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- secure board management software for meeting preparation, collaboration, and governance documentation
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Nasdaq Boardvantage's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: nasdaq.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nasdaq Boardvantage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nasdaq Boardvantage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nasdaq Boardvantage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Nasdaq Boardvantage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nasdaq Boardvantage, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.