OnBoard vs Boardable
Thirteen of fourteen models named OnBoard first on the direct prompt; zero named Boardable. Both were named by all fourteen models and OnBoard carries 54 labels and Boardable 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board portals page.
By framing
OnBoardFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoardable
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, OnBoard and Boardable were named in the same answer 138 times, of the 262 answers naming OnBoard and the 207 naming Boardable. In those answers Boardable took the first choice thirty times and OnBoard eighteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
OnBoard Boardable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OnBoard on the left and Boardable on the right.The direct prompt
OnBoard first, Boardable an alternative
13 of 14 modelsBoardable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Boardable30%#2 of 8OnBoard2%#4 of 8OnBoard49%#1 of 10Boardable20%#2 of 10What the models said about OnBoard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Skip enterprise platforms like Diligent and OnBoard unless your budget is $6,000+/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Some reviewers report friction with large file uploads... Be cautious if you handle large documents regularly.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I recommend OnBoard or Convene, as they offer the best balance of modern user experience, governance features, and scalable pricing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“OnBoard is the strongest default choice if you want the best balance of usability, governance features, and fit for mid-market boards.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Boardable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Cost-effective, but may lack depth for complex B2B boards.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“If you need per-user pricing and are a nonprofit / community board, Boardable is the most frequently recommended low-cost option.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.