Three of fourteen models named BILL Accounts Payable first on the direct prompt; two named AvidXchange. Both were named by all fourteen models and BILL Accounts Payable carries 61 labels and AvidXchange 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the accounts payable automation page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, BILL Accounts Payable and AvidXchange were named in the same answer fifty-five times, of the 162 answers naming BILL Accounts Payable and the 174 naming AvidXchange. In those answers AvidXchange took the first choice two times and BILL Accounts Payable twelve.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Multiple users complain about Bill.com's practice of holding funds for extended periods — up to a week — before releasing them, which affects cash flow.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools with Notable Concerns ... Persistent Bugs | Reuses invoice numbers from archived vendors, causing reconciliation errors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“BILL AP/AR | Payment issues, sync errors, poor support” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, I'd suggest starting with BILL for its balance of affordability, ease of use, and comprehensive features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, BILL offers the best balance of features, pricing transparency, and scalability.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Bill.com or Tipalti as they balance strong automation with reasonable complexity” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Slow Payments | Payment holds and delays that frustrate vendors ... High Fees” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“The "Rebate-Driven" Payment Processors (e.g., AvidXchange, Paymode-X, Paymerang) ... Why you should be cautious” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“the vendor payment network practices and support inconsistency make it worth cautious evaluation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For mid-market AP and payment automation, AvidXchange and MineralTree are strong options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.