Accounts payable automation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “accounts payable automation software”, and as “invoice processing automation”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
20%
Contested · Tipalti 18%
20Coupa18Tipalti13Basware49others
20% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+2Since September 2026: 18% → 19%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Coupa held the lead, +2 points on 18%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
BILL Accounts Payable41%Clear leader▲+3Since September 2026: 41% → 44%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Ramp22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Ramp (22%) replaces Stampli (19% then, 20% now), 2 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Coupa20%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 18% → 19%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
BILL Accounts Payable41%Clear leader▲+3Since September 2026: 41% → 44%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketRamp22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Ramp (22%) replaces Stampli (19% then, 20% now), 2 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseCoupa20%Contested▲+2Since September 2026: 18% → 19%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Coupa20%12%51accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 18% → 19%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 19%
Coupa20%12%51accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 18% → 19%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 19%02
Tipalti18%5%57accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 18% → 19%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 19%
Tipalti18%5%57accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 18% → 19%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 19%03
Basware13%7%30accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 9%
Basware13%7%30accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 9%04
HighRadius13%0%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 15%
HighRadius13%0%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 15%05
Medius5%0%29accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 4%
Medius5%0%29accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 4%06
Stampli4%8%25accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Stampli4%8%25accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%07BILL Accounts Payable4%60%30criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
BILL Accounts Payable4%60%30criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%08
SAP Concur2%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
SAP Concur2%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%09
SAP Ariba2%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
SAP Ariba2%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Ramp0%57%21criticized challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%
Ramp0%57%21criticized challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%10
AvidXchange0%25%24criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
AvidXchange0%25%24criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Ramp vs AvidXchangeRamp vs MelioRamp vs MediusRamp vs AirbaseStampli vs BILL Accounts PayableStampli vs TipaltiStampli vs AvidXchangeStampli vs MelioStampli vs MediusStampli vs AirbaseBILL Accounts Payable vs TipaltiBILL Accounts Payable vs AvidXchangeBILL Accounts Payable vs MelioBILL Accounts Payable vs MediusBILL Accounts Payable vs AirbaseTipalti vs AvidXchangeTipalti vs MelioTipalti vs MediusTipalti vs AirbaseAvidXchange vs MelioAvidXchange vs MediusAvidXchange vs AirbaseMelio vs MediusMelio vs AirbaseMedius vs Airbase
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Coupa20%
Coupa20%02Tipalti18%
Tipalti18%03Basware13%
Basware13%04HighRadius13%
HighRadius13%05Medius5%
Medius5%06Stampli4%
Stampli4%07BILL Accounts Payable4%
BILL Accounts Payable4%08SAP Concur2%
SAP Concur2%09SAP Ariba2%
SAP Ariba2%10AvidXchange0%
AvidXchange0%11Ramp0%
Ramp0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BILL Accounts Payable60%
18 of 30 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Large enterprises should avoid or be cautious about Ramp Bill Pay and Bill.com due to their limited scalability and feature set” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Ramp57%
12 of 21 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Large enterprises should avoid or be cautious about Ramp Bill Pay and Bill.com due to their limited scalability and feature set” Mistral Small, negative prompt
AvidXchange25%
6 of 24 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“standard per-seat pricing models (like AvidXchange or traditional enterprise suites) will likely result in unmanageable expenses and contract complexity” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Melio80%
4 of 5 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Built specifically for small businesses; lacks enterprise-grade controls, multi-entity support, and complex workflow capabilities” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1103 links across 215 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · G241 answers · 61 citations · 12 models
vendor site · HighRadius38 answers · 68 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Ramp38 answers · 59 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Medius37 answers · 77 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Corpay30 answers · 54 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Tipalti29 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · BILL26 answers · 30 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Brex19 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Stampli18 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Rillion16 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G216 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
23 answers · 8 models
23 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “accounts payable automation software”, “ap automation tools”, “best accounts payable automation software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coupa coupa.com | 20% | 674 | 60,500 | 1,210 | 41,319 | $339 | 91 | |
| Tipalti tipalti.com | 18% | 517 | 18,100 | 381 | 213,652 | $83,363 | 120 | 6 |
| HighRadius highradius.com HighRadius 13%, HighRadius AP Automation 2% | 15% | 691 | 6,600 | 118 | 294,561 | $2,272 | 120 | |
| Basware basware.com | 13% | 145 | 2,400 | 43 | 5,271 | 34 | ||
| Yooz getyooz.com | 11% | 24 | 4,400 | 36 | 11,827 | $231 | 36 | |
| Medius medius.com | 5% | 98 | 2,900 | 2,183 | 43,385 | $6,291 | 30 | 5 |
| Stampli stampli.com | 4% | 157 | 18,100 | 68 | 26,332 | $39 | 53 | 1 |
| BILL bill.com BILL Accounts Payable 4% | 4% | 158 | 2,740,000 | 1,063,001 | 1,783,039 company | $199,231 | 119 | |
| SAP Ariba sap.com SAP Concur 2%, SAP Ariba 2% | 4% | 519 | 74,000 | 502 | 2,214,514 | $1,251 | 23 | |
| SAP Concur Invoice concur.com | 2% | 18 | 30 | 0 | 445,133 | $116 | 86 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (brex.com, medius.com, stampli.com, tipalti.com). The first result for “accounts payable automation software” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best accounts payable automation software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which invoice processing automation would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade AP automation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best accounts payable automation software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an accounts payable automation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which AP automation tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SAP Concur, Tipalti Accounts Payable AutomationHighRadiusChangedTipaltiagainst: BILL Accounts Payable, RampYoozagainst: Coupano first choiceagainst: Basware, Coupa
Three alternatives
Coupa, Medius, StampliFour alternatives
Basware, Coupa, SAP Concur, TipaltiFour alternatives
Basware, Coupa, Medius, StampliOne alternative
TipaltiGPT-5.4 miniBaswareBasware, SAP AribaChangedSAP Ariba, TipaltiMediusagainst: BILL Accounts Payableno first choiceagainst: IPS AP Automation, ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations
Five alternatives
Coupa, Esker, HighRadius, Medius, TipaltiTwo alternatives
Oracle AP automation, TipaltiThree alternatives
BILL Accounts Payable, Oracle NetSuite, TradeshiftOne alternative
HighRadiusGemini 3.5 FlashTipaltiagainst: BILL Accounts Payable, RampCoupaChangedagainst: BILL Accounts Payable, RampMediusStampli, Yoozagainst: BILL Accounts Payable, RampTipaltiagainst: BILL Accounts Payableagainst: AvidXchange, BILL Accounts Payable, Brex, Expensify, Melio, Ramp, ReadSoft, SAP Concur, Tungsten Automation
Four alternatives
AvidXchange, Coupa, Medius, StampliFour alternatives
Medius, Tipalti, Tungsten Automation, Vic.aiFive alternatives
AvidXchange, Basware, Coupa, Stampli, TipaltiTwo alternatives
MineralTree, TipaltiFour alternatives
AvidXchange, Basware, Coupa, MineralTreePerplexity SonarCoupaHighRadiusChangedno first choiceagainst: AvidXchangeBILL Accounts Payableno first choiceagainst: Airbase, BILL Accounts Payable, Brex, FreshBooks, Melio, Ramp
Five alternatives
Basware, Corpay, Medius, SAP Concur, TipaltiTwo alternatives
Basware, TipaltiFive alternatives
Coupa, Oracle EPM, SAP Concur, Stampli, TipaltiGrok 4.1 FastBaswareagainst: SAP Ariba/ConcurCoupaChangedagainst: AvidXchangeStampli, TipaltiYoozagainst: BILL Accounts Payable, Coupa, Melio, Oracle NetSuite, Ramp, SAP Ariba, Sageno first choiceagainst: BILL Accounts Payableagainst: Coupa, Nanonets, SAP Concur Invoice, Serrala, Tipalti
Three alternatives
Coupa, Esker, IvaluaFour alternatives
Basware, HighRadius, Oracle Procurement Cloud, SAP AribaFour alternatives
AvidXchange, BILL Accounts Payable, Coupa, MediusTwo alternatives
AutoPayables, TipaltiFive alternatives
Corpay, HighRadius, Medius, Ramp, StampliMistral SmallCoupa, HighRadiusHighRadiusChangedTipaltiTipaltiagainst: SAP Aribano first choiceagainst: BILL Accounts Payable, Ramp, Tipalti
One alternative
BILL Accounts PayableTwo alternatives
Basware, TipaltiSix alternatives
BILL Accounts Payable, Coupa, Ramp, SAP Concur, Stampli, Vic.aiOne alternative
CoupaDeepSeek V4 FlashCoupa, HighRadiusHighRadius AP AutomationChangedagainst: Stamplino first choiceagainst: BaswareStampliagainst: BILL Accounts Payable, Coupa, SAP Ariba, TipaltiMediusnothing named
Four alternatives
Docsumo, Hypatos, Stampli, TipaltiTwo alternatives
Coupa, SAP ConcurSeven alternatives
Coupa, HighRadius, Medius, SAP Ariba, Stampli, Tipalti, ZycusFour alternatives
Coupa, SAP Concur, Stampli, TipaltiLlama 4 MaverickBILL Accounts PayableHighRadiusChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Paylocity, YouniumTwo alternatives
Basware, TipaltiQwen 3.7 FlashCoupa, TipaltiCoupa, TipaltiHeldagainst: BilltrustCoupaYoozagainst: AvidXchangeno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
AvidXchange, BlackLine, Oracle Fusion, SAP Ariba, TrullionOne alternative
SAP AribaFive alternatives
BILL Accounts Payable, Esker, Quadient AP, Sage Intacct, TipaltiOne alternative
TipaltiKimi K2SAP Concur Invoice, TipaltiBaswareChangedMediusagainst: SAP ConcurAutoPayables, Tipaltiagainst: BILL Accounts Payable, Brex, Rampno first choiceagainst: AvidXchange, BILL Accounts Payable, Melio, MineralTree, QuickBooks, SAP Concur Invoice, Stampli
Two alternatives
BILL Accounts Payable, HighRadius AP SuiteFour alternatives
Coupa, HighRadius, SAP Ariba, TipaltiFive alternatives
AvidXchange, Basware, Coupa, Esker, TipaltiThree alternatives
Coupa, Oracle Fusion, SAP AribaFive alternatives
Coupa, Medius, MineralTree, Stampli, TipaltiGLM 4.7 FlashXCoupaHighRadiusChangedMediusTipaltiagainst: AvidXchange, Brex, Coupa, Rampno first choiceagainst: SAP Concur
Four alternatives
Medius, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Concur, TipaltiTwo alternatives
SAP Concur, YoozEight alternatives
AvidXchange, Basware, Coupa, HighRadius, Ramp, SAP Concur Invoice, Stampli, TipaltiMiniMax M2.5Oracle NetSuiteCoupa, TipaltiChangedno first choiceYoozagainst: BILL Accounts Payableno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BILL Accounts Payable, Rossum, StampliOne alternative
SAP ConcurTwo alternatives
AutoPayables, TipaltiGPT-6 LunaBaswareBaswareHeldno first choiceBaswareno first choiceagainst: BILL Accounts Payable, Ramp
Four alternatives
Coupa, Esker, SAP Ariba, TipaltiTwo alternatives
Oracle's built-in Payables Agent, SAP AribaSeven alternatives
Basware, Coupa, Esker, Medius, Oracle Fusion Cloud Payables, SAP Ariba, TipaltiTwo alternatives
SAP Ariba, TipaltiMuse Glimmer 30BCoupa, Mediusagainst: BILL Accounts PayableCoupaChangedMediusTipalti, Yoozno first choiceagainst: Airbase, BILL Accounts Payable, Ramp
Two alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, SAP ConcurFive alternatives
Basware, HighRadius, OpenText VIM, SAP Ariba, TipaltiFive alternatives
AvidXchange, Basware, Coupa, SAP AP Automation / SAP Concur, Tungsten Automation formerly KofaxBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 25 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 14 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:36 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 23 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 6 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 25 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 24 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:38 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 25 | 61 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 21 | 63 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 10 | 47 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 22 | 47 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:32 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 8 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 26 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 15 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 20 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 14 | 83 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 22 | 125 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 15 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:52 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 15 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:30 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 21 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:22 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 3 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 17 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 21 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:31 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 22 | 78 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BILL read as BILL Accounts Payable
BILL (Bill.com) read as BILL Accounts Payable
BILL (formerly Bill.com) read as BILL Accounts Payable
BILL AP/AR read as BILL Accounts Payable
Bill.com read as BILL Accounts Payable
Bill.com / BILL read as BILL Accounts Payable
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Quadient read as Quadient AP
QuickBooks Bill Pay read as QuickBooks
Ramp Bill Pay read as Ramp
Unresolved, counted raw
ExFlow
HighRadius AP Automation
Hypatos
IPS AP Automation
OpenText VIM
Oracle AP automation
Oracle Fusion Cloud AP
Oracle Fusion Cloud Payables
Oracle's built-in Payables Agent
ReadSoft
SAP AP Automation / SAP Concur
Tipalti Accounts Payable Automation
Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.