Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 46 → 60 of 60
8 categories · RankedAvidXchange
174Judge labels
11First choices
31Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
8Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Business bill pay for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 98 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of AvidXchange →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business66 of 66
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market4 of 98
11%26 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 76
2%27 labels
accepted challenger
In business bill pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AvidXchange for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 11% | 4 of 98 | 0% | 26 | accepted challenger | ▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 9%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 5% | 5 of 54 | 8% | 37 | accepted challenger | ▼−8Since September 2026: 12% → 4%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 2% | 12 of 94 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 23 of 46 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 43 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 55 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 34 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 35% | |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 55 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AvidXchange held within the floor in all eight categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Business bill pay · by segment
Mid-market▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 9%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 89
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 13 → 6 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable automat | 12% | 4% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 12% → 4%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 of 54, unchanged |
| Business bill pay | 2% | 9% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 9%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 4 of 98 |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 12 of 94 |
| Cash application | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 43 of 83 |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 46, unchanged |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 101, unchanged |
| Expense management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 34 of 54, unchanged |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 101 → 55 of 136 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AvidXchange across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AvidXchange across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct39 labels5
Paraphrase22 labels5
Comparative51 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained22 labels1
Negative27 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative174 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Mid‑market and real‑estate verticals; strong AP automation ... AvidXchange is a strong contender.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Business bill pay · direct prompt · first choice
“My recommendation: Start with AvidXchange as it's specifically designed for mid-market businesses” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Business bill pay · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start by evaluating AvidXchange and BILL.com side-by-side ... if you're a true mid-market company” Kimi K2 · Business bill pay · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For mid-market AP and payment automation, AvidXchange and MineralTree are strong options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Slow Payments | Payment holds and delays that frustrate vendors ... High Fees” Kimi K2 · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · hard negative
“The "Rebate-Driven" Payment Processors (e.g., AvidXchange, Paymode-X, Paymerang) ... Why you should be cautious” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · soft negative
“the vendor payment network practices and support inconsistency make it worth cautious evaluation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AvidXchange, over the 174 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AvidXchange was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AvidXchange, over the 174 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AvidXchange was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AvidXchange. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 168 of the 174 answers that named AvidXchange and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
highradius.com83
ramp.com78
bill.com74
g2.com62
medius.com61
tipalti.com61
corpay.com58
wise.com38
stampli.com34
rillion.com33
582 of the 582 domain citations in answers naming AvidXchange came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
avidxchange.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, AvidXchange takes 11% of first choices and BILL takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
avidxchange.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, AvidXchange takes 11% of first choices and BILL takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “bill pay platforms”
2
Position for “bill pay platform for businesses”
2
- Searches for its name, Google
- 27,100 a month (“avidxchange”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 398 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 51,937 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,938 · 552 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,732
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 26 clicks and $788 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
11%
rank 4 of 98 in business bill pay
Segment leader
32%
BILL
- First choices
- 11 across its categories
- Named in
- 174 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 168 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on avidxchange.com
1,387
subdomains included
Content
1,147
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
39 · 71
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 522 | 17 | 2026-09-18 | Accounts payable automat, Accounting software | |
| Glossary or explainer | 256 | 0 | 2025-02-06 | Accounts payable automat, Invoicing software | |
| News or press | 240 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | Accounts payable automat | |
| Case study | 71 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | Accounts payable automat | |
| Conference or event | 17 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | ||
| Comparison | 17 | 5 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2026-05-01 | Accounts payable automat | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2024-12-10 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2023-08-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18Community association payment strategy blog
- 2026-09-10Payment automation audit blog
- 2026-09-10Avidxchange vs bottomline comparison
- 2026-09-10Paper checks cost cam blog
- 2026-09-10Ai in finance blog
- 2026-09-09Month end close process real estate blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page avidxchange.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as AvidXchange
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AvidXchange; a claim can dispute any of them.
AvidXchange (Supplier Hub) 1BILL/AvidXchange 1
Follow AvidXchange
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AvidXchange is its own company.ShowHide
The company
AvidXchange is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered accounts payable automation software for mid-market businesses and finance teams.
- For
- Mid-market businesses; finance teams; ERPs and accounting systems; suppliers in the AvidPay Network.
- Integrations claimed
- 200 avidxchange.com
- Certifications
- licensed as a Money Transmitter by the New York State Department of Financial ServicesSOC 1 Type 2SOC 2 Type 2PCI DSS v4.0.1NIST CSF
- Customers named
- Carolina Asthma Allergy CenterPeak PropertiesAdams and KnightWestport ConstructionSan Antonio ZooSmartBankSpeedway MotorsportsFounders 3 Management Company
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What AvidXchange's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: avidxchange.com, trust.avidxchange.com, avidxchange.com/products, avidxchange.com/customer-stories, avidxchange.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AvidXchange's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AvidXchange, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AvidXchange by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AvidXchange is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AvidXchange, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.