AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Spend and procurement › Corporate travel managem › TravelPerk vs Engine
Corporate travel management · October 2026 Edition

TravelPerk vs Engine

Six of fourteen models named TravelPerk first on the direct prompt; zero named Engine. TravelPerk was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Engine by seven and TravelPerk carries 60 labels and Engine 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

TravelPerk

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Engine

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share19%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels6011A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, TravelPerk reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Navan was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Navan vs TravelPerk · Navan vs Engine · TravelPerk vs Booking.com for Business

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate travel management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TravelPerkFirst choices, of fourteen modelsEngine
Direct60
Paraphrase10
Comparative20
Budget-constrained32
Scale-constrained10
Negative105 against TravelPerk · 2 against Engine
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, TravelPerk and Engine were named in the same answer twenty-six times, of the 162 answers naming TravelPerk and the 30 naming Engine. In those answers Engine took the first choice four times and TravelPerk three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where TravelPerk and Engine stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
TravelPerk Engine first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, TravelPerk on the left and Engine on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where TravelPerk and Engine stood in it.

TravelPerk first, Engine not the choice

6 of 14 modelsEngine was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarTravelPerk alternatives: Booking.com for Business, Corporate Traveler, Navan, Routespring
Llama 4 MaverickNavan, Routespring, TravelPerk
Qwen 3.7 FlashTravelPerk alternatives: Navan, Spotnana
Kimi K2Navan, TravelPerk alternatives: Ramp, Routespring, SAP Concur
GLM 4.7 FlashXNavan, TravelPerk alternatives: Ramp, SAP Concur
MiniMax M2.5Navan, TravelPerk alternatives: Spotnana

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Navan alternatives: Amex GBT Egencia, BCD Travel, Ramp, TravelPerk
GPT-5.4 miniNavan alternatives: Amex GBT Egencia, SAP Concur, TravelPerk
Gemini 3.5 FlashNavan alternatives: Amex GBT Egencia, Brex, Ramp, TravelPerk
Grok 4.1 FastNavan alternatives: Ramp, TravelPerk
DeepSeek V4 FlashNavan alternatives: Amex GBT Egencia, SAP Concur, TravelPerk
GPT-6 LunaNavan alternatives: Ramp, TravelPerk
Muse Glimmer 30BNavan, formerly TripActions alternatives: Booking.com for Business, Ramp, SAP Concur, TravelPerk

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallNavan alternatives: Booking.com for Business, Certify, Routespring

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
TravelPerk leads by twenty-four points.
TravelPerk27%#2 of 12
Engine4%#5 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
TravelPerk leads by fifteen points.
TravelPerk19%#2 of 12
Engine3%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
TravelPerk0%#8 of 11
Engine0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about TravelPerk

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Booking-software-first platforms, including options such as TravelPerk/Perk or Spotnana, deserve extra scrutiny if you need a live agent during disruptions.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“solid overall, but some comparative review data shows complaints around limited options, booking confusion, and hotel issues” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“TravelPerk has some customer complaints about higher prices and poor support in user reviews” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“modern platforms like Navan and TravelPerk are winning on user experience, AI booking assistance, and transparent pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want the fastest implementation and the lowest administrative burden, start with TravelPerk or Navan.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Perk's Starter plan, which is free with no platform fee and a 5% fee (capped at $30 per booking) for bookings.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Engine

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“self-serve travel management platforms, such as Engine, Itilite, Navan, and Perk, may have limitations and compliance gaps” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“user reviews highlight slow and inconsistent support response times” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“For a budget-limited company, Engine or Ramp stand out for having zero platform fees and no contracts” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“I strongly recommend starting with Engine since it's completely free with no hidden costs” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Engine is recommended for companies that want free access to pre-negotiated hotel rates, consolidated billing, and policy enforcement without implementation cycles” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.