Small business▲+11Since September 2026: 18% → 30%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
30%from 18% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 3 → 2 of 46
1 category · RankedTravelPerk
164Judge labels
25First choices
22Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
27% in Corporate travel managem for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 60 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of TravelPerk →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 49
27%62 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 61
19%60 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise9 of 49
0%42 labels
criticized challenger
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TravelPerk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 19% | 2 of 61 | 8% | 60 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 22% → 22%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TravelPerk held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate travel managem · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 22% → 22%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 22% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 2 of 57, unchanged
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 6 → 9 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel managem | 22% | 22% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 22% → 22%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 61, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TravelPerk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TravelPerk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct34 labels10
Paraphrase22 labels6
Comparative35 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained32 labels5
Scale-constrained19 labels4
Negative22 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative164 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 36 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“modern platforms like Navan and TravelPerk are winning on user experience, AI booking assistance, and transparent pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want the fastest implementation and the lowest administrative burden, start with TravelPerk or Navan.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate travel managem · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Perk's Starter plan, which is free with no platform fee and a 5% fee (capped at $30 per booking) for bookings.” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice
“If your team is remote-heavy or relies heavily on Slack/Teams, Perk is likely the strongest choice.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Booking-software-first platforms, including options such as TravelPerk/Perk or Spotnana, deserve extra scrutiny if you need a live agent during disruptions.” GPT-6 Luna · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
“solid overall, but some comparative review data shows complaints around limited options, booking confusion, and hotel issues” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
“TravelPerk has some customer complaints about higher prices and poor support in user reviews” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
“such as Engine, Itilite, Navan, and Perk, may have limitations and compliance gaps” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TravelPerk, over the 162 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TravelPerk was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TravelPerk, over the 162 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TravelPerk was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TravelPerk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 156 of the 162 answers that named TravelPerk and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
navan.com114
perk.comYour site90
ottotheagent.com88
g2.com79
ramp.com74
business.booking.com67
brex.com51
learn.g2.com51
oncehub.com49
engine.com46
619 of the 709 domain citations in answers naming TravelPerk came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
perk.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, TravelPerk takes 19% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.ShowHide
Search and answers
perk.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, TravelPerk takes 19% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “travel management platforms”
8
Position for “corporate travel booking platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“travelperk”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 113 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 37,067 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,029 · 149 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,353
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
19%
rank 2 of 61 in corporate travel managem
Segment leader
53%
Navan
- First choices
- 25 across its categories
- Named in
- 162 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 156 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on perk.com
4,067
subdomains included
Content
1,596
counted in the table below
Documentation
111
Product · Integration
3 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 822 | 18 | 2026-09-28 | Expense management, Corporate cards | |
| Case study | 224 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 220 | undated | Expense management, Corporate travel managem | ||
| News or press | 141 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 94 | 2 | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Comparison | 65 | 0 | 2026-01-14 | Corporate cards | |
| Glossary or explainer | 24 | 0 | 2025-08-14 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28How to reduce maverick spend blog
- 2026-09-28How to improve expense policy compliance without impacting efficiency blog
- 2026-09-21Reclaim european vat on business trips blog
- 2026-09-17Best practices for an expense reimbursement policy blog
- 2026-09-15Perk Spend Is Now Available in the US blog
- 2026-09-15Why connected travel and spend needs more than an integration blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page perk.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name expense management (31); 4 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as TravelPerk
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TravelPerk; a claim can dispute any of them.
Perk (formerly TravelPerk) 14Perk 10TravelPerk / Perk 4Perk / TravelPerk 2TravelPerk (now Perk) 2Perk (Formerly TravelPerk) 1TravelPerk/Perk 1
Follow TravelPerk
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TravelPerk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TravelPerk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TravelPerk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TravelPerk is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TravelPerk, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where TravelPerk is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where TravelPerk is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideTravelPerk is among the products AI models recommend first in Corporate travel management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.