AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Spend and procurement › Corporate travel managem › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Corporate travel management for enterprise buyers

Asked as “corporate travel booking platform”, and as “business travel management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46SAP Concur28Navan10Amex GBT Egencia16others

46% of first choices, clear leader.

Since September 2026=heldSince September 2026: 48% → 48%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.SAP Concur held the lead, ±0 points on 48%, inside the 10-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01SAP Concur46%17%69endorsed leader=heldSince September 2026: 48% → 48%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.48% → 48%
02Navan28%12%67accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 28% → 29%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 29%
03Amex GBT Egencia10%9%43accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 7%
04American Express Global Business Travel6%23%26accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 7%
05Ramp4%13%15accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
06ITILITE2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
07Spotnana2%8%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Booking.com for Business0%54%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
08TravelPerk0%26%42criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
10CWT0%25%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09BCD Travel0%20%20accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01SAP Concur46%
02Navan28%
03Amex GBT Egencia10%
04American Express Global Business Travel6%
05Ramp4%
06ITILITE2%
07Spotnana2%
08TravelPerk0%
09BCD Travel0%
10CWT0%
11Booking.com for Business0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Concur
17%
12 of 69 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Predictable Costs | SAP Concur | Per-transaction + per-user + per-expense-report fees” Kimi K2, budget prompt
TravelPerk
26%
11 of 42 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid: **Percentage-based pricing** (like Perk's 3-5% per booking)” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
Navan
12%
8 of 67 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“**Avoid** Navan if you have complex global routes, heavy international travel, or require guaranteed live-agent support during disruptions.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Booking.com for Business
54%
7 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“These platforms can be acceptable for ad‑hoc or small‑scale bookings, but they should **not** be the core corporate travel platform for a large enterprise.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1109 links across 191 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Navan63 answers · 127 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Otto the Agent39 answers · 55 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Ramp36 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Perk34 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G230 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G229 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Booking.com27 answers · 41 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Brex27 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Engine25 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ITILITE22 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 35 citations · 12 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best corporate travel booking platform”, “corporate travel booking platform”, “travel management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
SAP Concur sap.com46%41474,0005022,214,514$1,25123
Navan navan.com
Navan 28%, Navan, formerly TripActions 0%
28%306110,0001,342175,958$2,7161202
Amex GBT Egencia egencia.com10%90170516,42601
American Express americanexpress.com
American Express Global Business Travel 6%
6%393,350,00023,18522,105,127 company$20,307119
Ramp ramp.com4%1042246,00049,733770,056$13,511120
ITILITE itilite.com2%258801229,741$1217
Spotnana spotnana.com2%286,600753,4591
Routespring routespring.com2%113201674
TravelPerk perk.com0%1565,40011337,067808
BCD bcdtravel.com
BCD Travel 0%
0%399,90022441,942167

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (business.booking.com, engine.com, learn.g2.com, navan.com, oncehub.com, perk.com). The first result for “best corporate travel booking platform” is learn.g2.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best corporate travel booking platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which business travel management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade travel management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best corporate travel booking platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a corporate travel booking platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which travel management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SAP Concur
Two alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, Navan
SAP ConcurHeld
Two alternativesAmerican Express Global Business Travel, Navan
Navan, SAP Concur
One alternativeAmex GBT Egencia
SAP Concur
Two alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, Navan
no first choiceagainst: Navan, TravelBank, myBiz
GPT-5.4 miniSAP Concur
Three alternativesAmerican Express Global Business Travel, Amex GBT Egencia, Navan
against: TravelPerk
NavanChanged
One alternativeSAP Concur
against: American Express Global Business Travel, Amex GBT Egencia, TravelPerk
SAP Concur
Three alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, Navan, TravelPerk
SAP Concur
Two alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, Navan
no first choiceagainst: CWT, Corporate Travel Management, Corporate Traveler, Navan
Gemini 3.5 FlashNavan
Four alternativesAmerican Express Global Business Travel, Amex GBT Egencia, SAP Concur, Spotnana
NavanHeld
Three alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, SAP Concur, TravelPerk
no first choiceITILITE, Spotnana
Three alternativesNavan, Ramp, TravelPerk
no first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Booking.com for Business, Brex, Expedia TAAP, Expensify Travel, Navan, Ramp, SAP Concur, TravelPerk
Perplexity SonarSAP Concur
One alternativeNavan
against: Booking.com for Business
SAP ConcurHeld
One alternativeNavan
SAP Concur
Six alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, BCD Travel, CWT, ITILITE, Navan, Spotnana
against: TravelPerk
SAP Concur
Two alternativesBooking.com for Business, Brex
against: Expensify Travel, TravelPerk
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastNavan, SAP Concur
One alternativeAmex GBT Egencia
SAP ConcurChanged
Two alternativesNavan, TravelPerk
Navan
Three alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, SAP Concur, TravelPerk
SAP Concur
One alternativeNavan
against: Ramp, TravelPerk
no first choiceagainst: American Express Global Business Travel, Amex GBT Egencia, BCD Travel, CTM Travel, Navan, SAP Concur
Mistral SmallNavan
Two alternativesSAP Concur, TravelPerk
against: Booking.com for Business
Amex GBT EgenciaChanged
Four alternativesBCD Travel, CWT, Navan, SAP Concur
SAP Concur
Four alternativesAmadeus Cytric, American Express Global Business Travel, Amex GBT Egencia, Navan
SAP Concur
Two alternativesBrex, Navan
no first choiceagainst: American Express Global Business Travel, Navan, SAP Concur, Spotnana, TravelPerk
DeepSeek V4 FlashNavan
Two alternativesSAP Concur, TravelPerk
SAP ConcurChanged
Two alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, Navan
no first choice
Seven alternativesAmerican Express Global Business Travel, BCD Travel, ITILITE, Navan, SAP Concur, Spotnana, TravelPerk
Amex GBT Egencia, Navanagainst: SAP Concur, TravelPerkno first choiceagainst: Amex GBT Egencia, Expensify Travel, Navan, SAP Concur
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceAmerican Express Global Business Travel, RoutespringChangedAmerican Express Global Business Travel, SAP Concur
One alternativeRamp
Amex GBT Egencia, Navan, SAP Concurno first choiceagainst: SAP Concur
Qwen 3.7 FlashSAP Concur
Two alternativesNavan, TravelPerk
American Express Global Business TravelChanged
Three alternativesBCD Travel, Cvent, Navan
SAP Concur
Three alternativesAmerican Express Global Business Travel, Emburse, Navan
American Express Global Business Travel
Three alternativesBCD Travel, CWT, Navan
no first choiceagainst: Booking.com for Business, Expedia Corporate Traveller, Expensify Travel, Fyle, Payhawk, SAP Concur, Skyscanner Business, Trip Actions/Navan
Kimi K2Navan
Three alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, SAP Concur, TravelPerk
SAP ConcurChanged
One alternativeNavan
no first choiceNavan
Two alternativesITILITE, TravelPerk
against: American Express Global Business Travel, CWT, SAP Concur
no first choiceagainst: American Express Global Business Travel, Amex GBT Egencia, BCD Travel, CWT, Navan, SAP Concur
GLM 4.7 FlashXSAP Concur
Eight alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, BCD Travel, CWT, Engine, ITILITE, Navan, Ramp, TravelPerk
SAP ConcurHeld
Two alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, Navan
Amex GBT Egencia, SAP Concur
Five alternativesBCD Travel, Navan, Ramp, Spotnana, TravelPerk
Ramp
Two alternativesNavan, TravelPerk
against: SAP Concur
no first choiceagainst: Booking.com for Business, Expedia Corporate, Hotels.com, Hotwire, KAYAK for Business, Orbitz, Priceline, Travelocity, TripAdvisor
MiniMax M2.5Navan
Three alternativesBooking.com for Business, SAP Concur, TravelPerk
Navan, SAP ConcurChanged
One alternativeAmerican Express Global Business Travel
SAP Concur
Three alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, Navan, TravelPerk
SAP Concur
Two alternativesEngine, ITILITE
against: TravelPerk
no first choiceagainst: BCD Travel, Booking.com for Business, Navan
GPT-6 LunaNavan
Three alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, SAP Concur, TravelPerk
SAP ConcurChanged
Two alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, Navan
no first choice
Seven alternativesAmerican Express Global Business Travel, BCD Travel, FCM Travel, Navan, SAP Concur, Spotnana, TravelPerk
Amex GBT Egencia
Three alternativesNavan, SAP Concur, Spotnana
no first choice
Three alternativesAmex GBT Egencia, Navan, SAP Concur
against: TravelPerk
against: American Express Global Business Travel, CWT, Legacy SAP Travel Management / FI-TV, SAP Concur
Muse Glimmer 30BAmex GBT Egencia, Navan, SAP ConcurSAP ConcurChanged
One alternativeNavan
SAP Concur
Four alternativesAmerican Express Global Business Travel, Amex GBT Egencia, Navan, formerly TripActions, TravelPerk
Ramp
One alternativeNavan
against: SAP Concur
no first choiceagainst: BCD Travel, Booking.com for Business, Corporate Travel Management, TravelPerk
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:56yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:24yes34 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:04yes1726 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:26yes184 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:24yes249 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:52yes1310 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:43yes2527 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:42yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:41yes1242 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:48yes1526 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:38yes2475 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:51yes516 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:16yes412 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:19yes1525 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:42yes108 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:29yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:26yes1523 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:56yes203 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:40yes249 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:08no07 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:21yes1914 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:31yes51 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:32no030 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:38yes2016 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:08yes24161 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:46yes1338 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:12yes214 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:49yes1420 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:38yes1520 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:23yes714 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:51yes2030 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:16yes197 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:21yes2115 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:27yes1911 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:25yes2052 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:35yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:51yes1039 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:14yes1831 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:34yes1840 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:36yes1322 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:38yes831 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:53yes1431 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:56yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:13yes36 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:40yes1734 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:15yes194 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:58yes229 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:07yes52 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:17yes2423 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:17yes51 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:27no027 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:54yes2433 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:31yes25139 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:21yes1744 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:06yes421 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:52yes2232 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:18yes1811 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:06yes38 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:28yes1332 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:49yes198 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:05yes157 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:37no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:56no019 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:49yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:37yes529 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:02yes1354 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:37yes2053 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:59yes1015 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:48yes638 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:22yes1423 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:17yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:29yes35 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:42yes1630 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:37yes173 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:14yes2510 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:08yes147 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:38yes2352 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:12yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:38yes1067 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:50yes2432 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:12yes15114 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:16yes1031 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:57yes327 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:49yes2532 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Amadeus read as Amadeus Cytric
Booking.com read as Booking.com for Business
Expensify read as Expensify Travel
Kayak read as KAYAK for Business
Otto read as Otto the Agent
Perk read as TravelPerk
Perk (TravelPerk) read as TravelPerk
Perk (formerly TravelPerk) read as TravelPerk
Rippling read as Rippling Travel
Unresolved, counted raw
Airbnb for Work
CTM Travel
Cvent
Expedia Corporate
Expedia Corporate Traveller
Expedia Group
Expedia TAAP
Hotels.com
Legacy SAP Travel Management / FI-TV
Orbitz
Skyscanner Business
Travelocity
Trip Actions/Navan
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Corporate cardsExpense management →