Ramp vs SAP Concur
Seven of fourteen models named Ramp first on the direct prompt; two named SAP Concur. Both were named by all fourteen models and Ramp carries 53 labels and SAP Concur 45, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seventeen categories this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the expense management page.
By framing
RampFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSAP Concur
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Ramp and SAP Concur were named in the same answer 257 times, of the 1084 answers naming Ramp and the 439 naming SAP Concur. In those answers SAP Concur took the first choice forty times and Ramp fifty-seven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Ramp SAP Concur first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ramp on the left and SAP Concur on the right.The direct prompt
Ramp first, SAP Concur an alternative
7 of 14 modelsSAP Concur was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.SAP Concur first, Ramp an alternative
2 of 14 modelsRamp was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Ramp25%#2 of 8SAP Concur0%#8 of 8SAP Concur68%#1 of 10Ramp15%#2 of 10What the models said about Ramp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Ramp or Brex (Best for Card-First, Modern Spend Management): Free platform fees, incredibly fast to set up, highly modern UI, and top-tier AI receipt matching.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Ramp (Best Overall Free Option) ... Go with Ramp. It will save your team dozens of hours of manual receipt-chasing, and you will pay $0 in software fees.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about SAP Concur
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Cautions: Slow OCR, rigid workflows, and approver experience issues are common in larger enterprise rollouts.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“SAP Concur - has an outdated and unintuitive user interface, complex and time-consuming expense submission.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Choose SAP Concur / Navan for large, international B2B with travel + expense integration and strict compliance.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.