Small business▼−9Since September 2026: 74% → 65%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
65%from 74% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 1 of 73, unchanged
17 categories · RankedRamp
1,084Judge labels
281First choices
130Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
17Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
68% in Corporate cards for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 67 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
7 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 64 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Ramp →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 78
68%68 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market1 of 67
52%64 labels
endorsed leader
Enterprise1 of 65
34%61 labels
endorsed leader
In corporate cards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Ramp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate cards | Spend and procurement | 52% | 1 of 67 | 11% | 64 | endorsed leader | ▼−21Since September 2026: 69% → 48%, −21 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 44% | 1 of 46 | 12% | 66 | endorsed leader | ▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 35% | 1 of 54 | 8% | 53 | endorsed leader | ▼−1Since September 2026: 34% → 33%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 22% | 1 of 54 | 9% | 45 | accepted challenger | ▲+6Since September 2026: 16% → 22%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 21% | 2 of 98 | 2% | 43 | accepted challenger | ▲+14Since September 2026: 7% → 21%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 12% | 3 of 87 | 9% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 17% → 12%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 5% | 4 of 61 | 8% | 38 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business banking | Treasury and cash | 2% | 13 of 86 | 20% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 2% | 14 of 82 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 2% | 12 of 111 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 21 of 94 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Contractor payments | Spend and procurement | 0% | 53 of 98 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Tipalti at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B BNPL and net terms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 60 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Resolve Pay at 56% | |
| Cross-border payments and FX | Treasury and cash | 0% | 40 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 39% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 51 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Telecom expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 57 of 89 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Genuity at 19% | |
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 73 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Ramp moved past the floor in two of seventeen categories: Corporate cards, −21 points to 48%; Business bill pay, +14 points to 21%. It held within the floor in the other fifteen.
Best category · Corporate cards · by segment
Mid-market▼−21Since September 2026: 69% → 48%, −21 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
48%from 69% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 11 pointsRank 1 of 61, unchanged
Enterprise▼−17Since September 2026: 51% → 34%, −17 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
34%from 51% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 of 62, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate cards | 69% | 48% | ▼−21Since September 2026: 69% → 48%, −21 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 of 67, unchanged |
| Business bill pay | 7% | 21% | ▲+14Since September 2026: 7% → 21%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 4 → 2 of 98 |
| Spend management platfor | 49% | 43% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 49% → 43%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 46, unchanged |
| Accounts payable automat | 16% | 22% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 16% → 22%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 1 of 54 |
| Procure-to-pay | 17% | 12% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 17% → 12%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 87 |
| Business banking | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 13 of 86 |
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 14 of 82 |
| Corporate travel managem | 4% | 6% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 61, unchanged |
| Expense management | 34% | 33% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 34% → 33%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 54, unchanged |
| Supplier management | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 12 of 111 |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 21 of 94 |
| Contractor payments | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 53 of 98 |
| B2B BNPL and terms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 90, unchanged |
| Cross-border payments | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 40 of 87, unchanged |
| Invoicing software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 51 of 71 |
| Telecom expense mgmt | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 89, unchanged |
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 59 → 73 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Ramp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Ramp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 24 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 16 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 19 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 39 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 5 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 20 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 15 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 33 |
| Mistral Small | 5 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 20 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 15 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 34 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 17 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 12 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 27 |
| Kimi K2 | 16 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 31 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 6 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 22 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 20 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 13 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 27 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 5 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 34 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct202 labels77
Paraphrase159 labels64
Comparative236 labels76not counted in share
Budget-constrained230 labels108
Scale-constrained124 labels32
Negative133 labels17not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1084 labels in all, every segment counted; 281 of the 374 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Ramp: Excellent for fast-growing mid-market companies. Strong automation, great ERP integrations, flat-rate cashback... Very popular for consolidated card, AP, and expense.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Spend management platfor · scale prompt · first choice
“Ramp or Brex (Best for Card-First, Modern Spend Management): Free platform fees, incredibly fast to set up, highly modern UI, and top-tier AI receipt matching.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Expense management · scale prompt · first choice
“Ramp (Best Overall Free Option) ... Go with Ramp. It will save your team dozens of hours of manual receipt-chasing, and you will pay $0 in software fees.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Expense management · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want a truly fee‑free, easy‑to‑manage card with solid integration, Ramp, Brex, and Divvy are frequently mentioned by small businesses.” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate cards · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users frequently cite issues with receipt management, such as problems with voiding transactions and unusable CSV exports.” Mistral Small · Spend management platfor · negative prompt · hard negative
“Ramp can be cost-effective for card-first teams, but finance teams needing robust, real-time AP-to-ERP workflows ... often find the AP layer thin.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · soft negative
“Many modern platforms (like Ramp and Brex) are "free" because they require you to migrate your company credit cards to their proprietary cards.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Spend management platfor · negative prompt · soft negative
“Ramp and Brex are strong for spend controls but "lack the managed service layer and vendor network depth that larger organizations need"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate cards · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ramp, over the 1084 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ramp was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ramp, over the 1084 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ramp was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ramp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1042 of the 1084 answers that named Ramp and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ramp.comYour site720
bill.com461
brex.com379
g2.com341
rippling.com296
learn.g2.com249
airwallex.com243
wise.com203
navan.com178
corpay.com168
2,518 of the 3,238 domain citations in answers naming Ramp came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Ramp stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Ramp stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “corporate card program”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “corporate card programs”
2
- Searches for its name, Google
- 246,000 a month (“ramp”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 49,733 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 770,056 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 68,870 · 5,399 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,968
- Paid Google search
- 10 searches its ads show for, about 430 clicks and $13,511 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
52%
rank 1 of 67 in corporate cards
First choices
281
across its categories
- Named in
- 1,084 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 1042 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ramp.com
5,942
subdomains included
Content
2,331
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,964
Product · Integration
2 · 131
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,276 | 33 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 362 | 29 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 239 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 143 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | ||
| Template or tool | 129 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | ||
| Case study | 104 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 61 | 1 | 2026-08-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 16 | 0 | 2025-12-16 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Financial due diligence blog
- 2026-09-29Accrual vs deferral in accounting comparison
- 2026-09-298 Best Corporate Card Expense Management Platforms blog
- 2026-09-28S corp tax benefits guide blog
- 2026-09-28Expense management workflow blog
- 2026-09-28How to do payroll yourself for your small business blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- July 15, 2026Build with Rillet + Ramp MCPSan Francisco · hosted
- July 9, 2026CLI & Cocktails with RampKilowatt, San Francisco · hosted
- July 8, 2026Build with Campfire + Ramp MCPCampfire HQ, San Francisco · hosted
As the event pages on ramp.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ramp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Ramp
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ramp; a claim can dispute any of them.
Ramp Bill Pay 29Ramp Travel 7Ramp Corporate Card 4Ramp Business Card 3Airbase / Ramp 1Ramp (Bill Pay) 1Ramp / Brex (Spend Management Platforms) 1Ramp Business Credit Card 1Ramp Credit Card 1Ramp Free 1
Follow Ramp
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Ramp is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Ramp is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Spend Management, Corporate Cards & Accounts Payable Solutions
- For
- finance teams
- Price stated
- Get started for free ramp.com
- Starting price
- 0 ramp.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Get started for free ramp.com
- Integrations claimed
- 200 ramp.com
- Certifications
- CCPAISO/IEC 27001PCI DSSSOC 1SOC 2FedRAMP ModerateCyber Essentials PlusGovRAMP
- Customers named
- eight sleepperplexitywebflowglossierNotionMindbody & ClassPassShopifyKIPP Nashville Public Schools
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Ramp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ramp.com, ramp.com/pricing, trust.ramp.com, ramp.com/platform, ramp.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ramp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ramp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ramp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Ramp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ramp, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Ramp is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Ramp is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideCorporate cards
AI models recommend Ramp first in Corporate cards this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Spend management platforms
AI models recommend Ramp first in Spend management platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Expense management
AI models recommend Ramp first in Expense management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Accounts payable automation
AI models recommend Ramp first in Accounts payable automation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Business bill pay
Ramp is among the products AI models recommend first in Business bill pay this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Procure-to-pay
Ramp is among the products AI models recommend first in Procure-to-pay this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.