Spendwise vs Zip
Zero of fourteen models named Spendwise first on the direct prompt; zero named Zip. Spendwise was named by nine of the fourteen models and Zip by ten and Spendwise carries 11 labels and Zip 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the procure-to-pay page.
By framing
SpendwiseFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZip
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Spendwise Zip first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Spendwise on the left and Zip on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Zip2%#6 of 8Spendwise0%#– of 8What the models said about Spendwise
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Ramp (free tier) and Spendwise (starting at $9/user/month) are especially attractive for companies with tight budgets” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“The Absolute Best Value: Spendwise ... most affordable fully-featured P2P platform on the market” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have fewer than 10 users and only need POs plus approvals, Spendwise at ~$9/user is unbeatable.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
What the models said about Zip
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Very fast intake and approval workflows, but may feel lighter than traditional P2P suites.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Zip: The gold standard for "intake-to-pay". Highly rated for its user interface and ability to orchestrate complex approvals” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.