Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 14 → 6 of 61
4 categories · RankedSpendwise
43Judge labels
9First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Procure-to-pay for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Spendwise →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 69
5%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 87
3%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise36 of 52
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In procure-to-pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Spendwise for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 3% | 5 of 87 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 2% | 19 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 36 of 46 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 67 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Spendwise held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Procure-to-pay · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 → 5 of 79
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 35 of 47, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | 4% | 4% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 5 of 87 |
| Supplier management | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 19 of 111 |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 46, unchanged |
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 67 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Spendwise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Spendwise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative14 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained19 labels9
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Ramp (free tier) and Spendwise (starting at $9/user/month) are especially attractive for companies with tight budgets” Mistral Small · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · first choice
“The Absolute Best Value: Spendwise ... most affordable fully-featured P2P platform on the market” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · first choice
“includes options like Spendwise, which starts at $9/month/user” Llama 4 Maverick · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have fewer than 10 users and only need POs plus approvals, Spendwise at ~$9/user is unbeatable.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spendwise, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spendwise was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spendwise, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spendwise was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spendwise. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 43 answers that named Spendwise and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
procuredesk.com32
spendflo.com29
ramp.com23
g2.com21
softwareconnect.com19
mindsprint.com18
learn.g2.com15
wise.com14
softwareadvice.com13
tradogram.com13
197 of the 197 domain citations in answers naming Spendwise came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
spendwise.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Spendwise takes 3% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.ShowHide
Search and answers
spendwise.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Spendwise takes 3% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “procurement platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “procure-to-pay platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“spendwise”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 401 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 110 · 3 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 346
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 5 of 87 in procure-to-pay
Segment leader
42%
Procurify
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 43 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 42 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on spendwise.com
47
subdomains included
Content
28
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 17 | 4 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-2110 top procurement software options for mid sized companies blog
- 2026-08-315 best e procurement software for higher education in 2026 blog
- 2026-08-215 ways procurement software improves business efficiency and reduces costs blog
- 2026-08-1915 must have features to look for in purchasing automation tools blog
- 2025-08-12Grant accounting and audit readiness blog
- 2025-03-05Drive business success with procure to pay best practices and technology blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page spendwise.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Spendwise
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Spendwise; a claim can dispute any of them.
ProcurementExpress / Spendwise 1Spendwise & Zoho 1
Follow Spendwise
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Spendwise is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Spendwise is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Spendwise is easy-to-use spend management software that helps automate your purchase requests, purchase orders, accounts payable, inventory management and more.
- For
- Business
- Price stated
- Basic: $9 user/month (min 1 user); Pro: $19 user/month (min 5 users); Enterprise: Contact Us (min 5 users) spendwise.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 9 spendwise.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial spendwise.com
- Certifications
- SAS 70 Type IIGoDaddy
- Customers named
- Deerhurst ResortHubbs-SeaWorld Research InstituteUnited Way South Hampton RoadsThe Hampton University Proton Therapy InstituteChesPennCanadian Plasma ResourcesAirport Van RentalLever
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Spendwise's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: spendwise.com, spendwise.com/pricing, spendwise.com/security, spendwise.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spendwise's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spendwise, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Spendwise by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Spendwise is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Spendwise, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.