oboloo vs Tradogram
Zero of fourteen models named oboloo first on the direct prompt; zero named Tradogram. oboloo was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Tradogram by nine and oboloo carries 11 labels and Tradogram 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the strategic sourcing page.
By framing
obolooFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTradogram
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, oboloo and Tradogram were named in the same answer twenty-five times, of the 37 answers naming oboloo and the 152 naming Tradogram. In those answers Tradogram took the first choice nine times and oboloo thirteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
oboloo Tradogram first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, oboloo on the left and Tradogram on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Tradogram31%#1 of 10oboloo11%#3 of 10oboloo15%#1 of 14Tradogram13%#3 of 14What the models said about oboloo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“better suited to small and medium enterprises ... rather than a larger mid-market deployment” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“oboloo is highly rated (4.8/5) and offers a "free forever" cloud-based e-procurement software suite... a strong choice for small businesses” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need a truly zero-cost start, oboloo's free-forever plan and Tradogram's 1-user free tier are the lowest floor options.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Tradogram
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Free tier (5 transactions/month) for testing; paid plans scale affordably but limited for ongoing use.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“A cloud-based e-sourcing and procurement platform built for small and mid-sized organizations... Pricing starts with a free tier” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.