Strategic sourcing · October 2026 Edition
Tradogram vs GEP SMART
Zero of fourteen models named Tradogram first on the direct prompt; two named GEP SMART. Tradogram was named by nine of the fourteen models and GEP SMART by nine and both carry 14 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share13%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%21%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1414Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Tradogram reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Precoro was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. oboloo vs Tradogram · oboloo vs GEP SMART · Precoro vs Tradogram
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the strategic sourcing page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TradogramFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGEP SMART
Direct021 against GEP SMART
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained401 against Tradogram · 1 against GEP SMART
Scale-constrained101 against GEP SMART
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Tradogram and GEP SMART stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Tradogram GEP SMART first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Tradogram on the left and GEP SMART on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Tradogram and GEP SMART stood in it.
GEP SMART first, Tradogram an alternative
2 of 14 modelsTradogram was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Perplexity SonarGEP SMART alternatives: Precoro, Procol, SAP Ariba Strategic Sourcing Suite
GLM 4.7 FlashXCoupa, GEP SMART alternatives: Ivalua, Precoro, ProcureWare, SAP Ariba, Scanmarket, ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations, Tradogram
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Archlet, Market Dojo, Tradogram, Zip
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcurify alternatives: Fairmarkit, GEP SMART, Market Dojo, Precoro
GPT-6 LunaWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Coupa, GEP SMART
Muse Glimmer 30BProcurify alternatives: Basware, GEP SMART, Precoro, Zycus
Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Precoro alternatives: Coupa, ProcurePort, SAP Ariba, Zycus
GPT-5.4 miniProcurify alternatives: Archlet, Bid Management
Grok 4.1 FastProcurify alternatives: Precoro
Mistral SmallProcurify alternatives: Ivalua, MeRLIN, SAP Ariba, Scanmarket
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashCoupa alternatives: Jaggaer, Precoro, Zycus
Kimi K2Precoro, Procurify alternatives: Ivalua, Zip
MiniMax M2.5Procurify, Scanmarket
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Tradogram leads by thirty-one points.
Tradogram31%#1 of 10GEP SMART0%#– of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: GEP SMART leads at enterprise.
GEP SMART6%#4 of 8Tradogram0%#– of 8What the models said about Tradogram
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Free tier (5 transactions/month) for testing; paid plans scale affordably but limited for ongoing use.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“A cloud-based e-sourcing and procurement platform built for small and mid-sized organizations... Pricing starts with a free tier” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about GEP SMART
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“NOT Recommended for Limited Budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“rather than a full suite like SAP Ariba, Coupa, Ivalua or GEP that is built for larger, ERP-native estates” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · soft negative
“GEP SMART: $500K+/year — Upper mid-market with consulting-led delivery” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Most mid-market B2B companies find that Coupa or GEP SMART provide the best balance of depth, analytics, and mid-market pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“the best overall fit is often GEP SMART” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“Offer enterprise-grade capabilities (like deep spend analytics and contract management) but packaged in a scaled-down, quicker-to-deploy format” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared
oboloo vs Tradogramoboloo vs GEP SMARTPrecoro vs TradogramPrecoro vs GEP SMARTTradogram vs ProcurifyTradogram vs Market DojoTradogram vs IvaluaTradogram vs CoupaProcurify vs GEP SMARTMarket Dojo vs GEP SMARTIvalua vs GEP SMARTGEP SMART vs CoupaAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full strategic sourcing standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.