Small business▼−9Since September 2026: 45% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
35%from 45% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 1 of 158, unchanged
3 categories · RankedTradogram
152Judge labels
51First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
31% in Strategic sourcing for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 128 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Tradogram →By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
Small business1 of 166
31%30 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market3 of 128
13%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise75 of 77
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tradogram for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 13% | 3 of 128 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 15% → 14%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 9% | 3 of 111 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 5% | 4 of 87 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tradogram held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 15% → 14%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 2 of 120, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 58 of 63, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | 6% | 4% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 87, unchanged |
| Supplier management | 6% | 8% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 111 |
| Strategic sourcing | 15% | 14% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 15% → 14%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 128 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tradogram across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tradogram across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels14
Paraphrase20 labels8
Comparative19 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained51 labels24
Scale-constrained17 labels5
Negative21 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative152 labels in all, every segment counted; 51 of the 58 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tradogram is the standout choice — it's purpose-built for procurement, has a genuinely free tier to start, and scales affordably” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice
“A cloud-based e-sourcing and procurement platform built for small and mid-sized organizations... Pricing starts with a free tier” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · first choice
“Tradogram is the best balance of cost and full P2P functionality, thanks to its free tier and $99/month entry point.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · first choice
“Precoro and Tradogram are particularly praised for their combination of affordability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Free tier (5 transactions/month) for testing; paid plans scale affordably but limited for ongoing use.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tradogram, over the 152 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tradogram was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tradogram, over the 152 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tradogram was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tradogram. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 151 of the 152 answers that named Tradogram and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
softwareconnect.com83
spendflo.com77
g2.com75
ramp.com74
tradogram.comYour site72
procuredesk.com58
softwareadvice.com56
mindsprint.com46
capterra.com43
sourceforge.net38
550 of the 622 domain citations in answers naming Tradogram came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
tradogram.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tradogram takes 13% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
tradogram.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tradogram takes 13% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “strategic sourcing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“tradogram”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 208,129 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,099 · 282 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,217
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
13%
rank 3 of 128 in strategic sourcing
Segment leader
15%
oboloo
- First choices
- 51 across its categories
- Named in
- 152 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 151 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tradogram.com
530
subdomains included
Content
444
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 303 | 14 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 95 | 0 | 2026-05-22 | ||
| Comparison | 25 | 2 | 2026-08-14 | ||
| Case study | 13 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 7 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Move purchasing off spreadsheets blog
- 2026-09-23Sourcing scorecard geography blog
- 2026-09-21Supply chain mapping blog
- 2026-09-17Tail spend management blog
- 2026-09-10Replace manual po workflows blog
- 2026-08-31Procurement software flexibility blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tradogram.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Tradogram
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tradogram; a claim can dispute any of them.
TRADOGRAM 2
Follow Tradogram
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tradogram is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Tradogram is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- configurable procurement software that gives growing procurement teams enterprise-grade control with mid-market simplicity
- For
- growing procurement teams
- Price stated
- Monthly; Yearly (Save 20%); Essentials $99/month; Premium Custom Quote; Scale Custom Quote tradogram.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $99/month tradogram.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 6 tradogram.com · 36 tradogram.com/integrations pages disagree
- Hosting
- Multi-Region Hosting
- Customers named
- Aversi-Pharma LLCAdheris HealthAge Well ArrowheadCDG EnterprisesCompass Charter SchoolsControl & Power SystemsRiver EdgeRiver Edge Behavioral Health
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, certifications
What Tradogram's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: tradogram.com, tradogram.com/pricing, tradogram.com/case-studies, tradogram.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tradogram's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tradogram, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tradogram by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tradogram is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tradogram, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Tradogram is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Tradogram is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideStrategic sourcing
Tradogram is among the products AI models recommend first in Strategic sourcing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Supplier management
Tradogram is among the products AI models recommend first in Supplier management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.