Strategic sourcing · October 2026 Edition
Procurify vs Market Dojo
Seven of fourteen models named Procurify first on the direct prompt; zero named Market Dojo. Procurify was named by nine of the fourteen models and Market Dojo by ten and Procurify carries 11 labels and Market Dojo 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share13%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1116A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Procurify reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Precoro was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. oboloo vs Procurify · oboloo vs Market Dojo · Precoro vs Procurify
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the strategic sourcing page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ProcurifyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMarket Dojo
Direct70
Paraphrase02
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Procurify and Market Dojo stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Procurify Market Dojo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Procurify on the left and Market Dojo on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Procurify and Market Dojo stood in it.
Procurify first, Market Dojo an alternative
7 of 14 modelsMarket Dojo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniProcurify alternatives: Archlet, Bid Management
Grok 4.1 FastProcurify alternatives: Precoro
Mistral SmallProcurify alternatives: Ivalua, MeRLIN, SAP Ariba, Scanmarket
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcurify alternatives: Fairmarkit, GEP SMART, Market Dojo, Precoro
Kimi K2Precoro, Procurify alternatives: Ivalua, Zip
MiniMax M2.5Procurify, Scanmarket
Muse Glimmer 30BProcurify alternatives: Basware, GEP SMART, Precoro, Zycus
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Archlet, Market Dojo, Tradogram, Zip
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Precoro alternatives: Coupa, ProcurePort, SAP Ariba, Zycus
Perplexity SonarGEP SMART alternatives: Precoro, Procol, SAP Ariba Strategic Sourcing Suite
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashCoupa alternatives: Jaggaer, Precoro, Zycus
GLM 4.7 FlashXCoupa, GEP SMART alternatives: Ivalua, Precoro, ProcureWare, SAP Ariba, Scanmarket, ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations, Tradogram
GPT-6 LunaWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Coupa, GEP SMART
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Market Dojo leads by five points.
Market Dojo9%#4 of 10Procurify4%#5 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Procurify leads at mid-market.
Procurify13%#4 of 14Market Dojo6%#5 of 14Enterprise
The order flips: Market Dojo leads at enterprise.
Market Dojo2%#– of 8Procurify0%#– of 8What the models said about Procurify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Procurify offers the best balance of speed-to-value, feature completeness, mid-market-specific design, and proven results.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“"Procurify is the best pick when mid-market finance and operations teams need controlled purchasing with department budgets and approvals"[” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Market Dojo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd start with Market Dojo. It looks like a sensible first demo for a mid-sized company that wants sourcing capabilities” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best low-budget pick for SMBs: Market Dojo — described as “affordable” and “self-service” e-sourcing software for SMBs” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Market Dojo is a highly popular, lightweight e-sourcing platform tailored perfectly for the mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
oboloo vs Procurifyoboloo vs Market DojoPrecoro vs ProcurifyPrecoro vs Market DojoTradogram vs ProcurifyTradogram vs Market DojoProcurify vs IvaluaProcurify vs GEP SMARTProcurify vs CoupaMarket Dojo vs IvaluaMarket Dojo vs GEP SMARTMarket Dojo vs CoupaAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full strategic sourcing standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.