Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 16% → 21%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
21%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 61
5 categories · RankedProcurify
232Judge labels
55First choices
28Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
42% in Procure-to-pay for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 87 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
12 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 2% of its 50 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Procurify →By buyer segmentA mid-market product: leader at mid-market, not named at enterprise.
Small business2 of 69
19%56 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 87
42%50 labels
endorsed leader
Enterprise51 of 52
0%14 labels
criticized challenger
In procure-to-pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Procurify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 42% | 1 of 87 | 2% | 50 | endorsed leader | ▼−3Since September 2026: 45% → 42%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 14% | 2 of 111 | 12% | 24 | accepted challenger | ▼−13Since September 2026: 26% → 12%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 13% | 4 of 128 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+9Since September 2026: 4% → 14%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 2% | 9 of 46 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 28 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Procurify moved past the floor in one of five categories: Supplier management, −13 points to 12%. It held within the floor in the other four.
Best category · Procure-to-pay · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 45% → 42%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
42%from 45% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 of 79, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 21 → 45 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | 26% | 12% | ▼−13Since September 2026: 26% → 12%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 → 2 of 111 |
| Strategic sourcing | 4% | 14% | ▲+9Since September 2026: 4% → 14%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 4 of 128 |
| Procure-to-pay | 45% | 42% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 45% → 42%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 87, unchanged |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 of 46, unchanged |
| Expense management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 28 of 54 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Procurify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Procurify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 12 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct61 labels31
Paraphrase36 labels15
Comparative41 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained21 labels1
Scale-constrained40 labels8
Negative33 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative232 labels in all, every segment counted; 55 of the 61 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Procurify offers the best balance of speed-to-value, feature completeness, mid-market-specific design, and proven results.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice
“An incredibly strong mid-market choice. It handles purchasing, POs, AP automation, and vendor management in one AI-powered, highly intuitive interface.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · scale prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Procurify or Precoro offer the best balance of functionality, ease of use, and mid-market specialization.” MiniMax M2.5 · Procure-to-pay · direct prompt · first choice
“"Procurify is the best pick when mid-market finance and operations teams need controlled purchasing with department budgets and approvals"[” Muse Glimmer 30B · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid platforms that force you to "request a quote" (like Coupa, ControlHub, or Procurify)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · budget prompt · hard negative
“Solid product but pricing starts around $2,000/month, making it less budget-friendly” Kimi K2 · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · soft negative
“Consideration: Some reported integration friction; no inventory management” MiniMax M2.5 · Supplier management · direct prompt · soft negative
“Start ~$499/month; more full-featured procure-to-pay but pricier for basics.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Supplier management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Procurify, over the 232 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Procurify was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Procurify, over the 232 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Procurify was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Procurify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 220 of the 232 answers that named Procurify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
spendflo.com106
g2.com100
ramp.com92
procuredesk.com84
mindsprint.com82
learn.g2.com67
precoro.com64
procurify.comYour site64
softwareconnect.com56
tradogram.com55
706 of the 770 domain citations in answers naming Procurify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Procurify stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Procurify stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “procurement platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “procure-to-pay platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 4,400 a month (“procurify”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 43 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 62,225 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,342 · 287 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,492
- Paid Google search
- 6 searches its ads show for, about 86 clicks and $282 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
42%
rank 1 of 87 in procure-to-pay
First choices
55
across its categories
- Named in
- 232 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 220 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on procurify.com
473
subdomains included
Content
278
counted in the table below
Documentation
56
Product · Integration
5 · 6
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 122 | 2 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| News or press | 60 | undated | |||
| Case study | 31 | 1 | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 19 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 16 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 15 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 0 | 2025-06-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Coupa comparison
- 2026-09-02Webinar ai in 20 minutes webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-28How this company saved 90k with ai contract management case study
- 2026-08-182026 mid market procurement benchmark report blog
- 2026-08-07Procurement software pricing models blog
- 2026-06-26Procurify vs precoro comparison
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 24, 2026 to June 25, 2026National Charter School ConferenceNew Orleans · exhibited
- June 3, 2026 to June 5, 2026CFO Leadership ConferenceBoston · attended
- April 28, 2026 to April 30, 2026Sage Futureplace not stated · sponsored
As the event pages on procurify.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page procurify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Procurify
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Procurify; a claim can dispute any of them.
Procurify/Precoro/Planergy 1
Follow Procurify
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Procurify is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Procurify is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Procurement Automation Software
- For
- finance and operations teams
- Price stated
- Procurify’s pricing is modular, not flat-rate. Every customer starts with Purchasing—approvals, budgets, analytics, integrations, and the mobile app included—then includes the products (AP, Expense & Card) and other add-ons (Guided Intake, Contracts) as they see fit. Quotes are built around specific products, add-ons, users, and integrations, so customers only pay for what their teams use, not an enterprise license built for a bigger company. procurify.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2GDPRSOC 1SOC 2SOC 3CCPA
- Customers named
- QuestradeNBCABlue Ridge AcademyPSC GroupCanal BargeAtlantech OnlineHyperFiberCurtin Maritime
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Procurify's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: procurify.com, procurify.com/pricing, trust.procurify.com, procurify.com/platform, procurify.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Procurify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Procurify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Procurify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Procurify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Procurify, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Procurify is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Procurify is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideProcure-to-pay
AI models recommend Procurify first in Procure-to-pay this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Supplier management
Procurify is among the products AI models recommend first in Supplier management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.