| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 6% | 5 of 128 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 61 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 4% | 5% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 5 of 128 |
| Supplier management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd start with Market Dojo. It looks like a sensible first demo for a mid-sized company that wants sourcing capabilities” GPT-6 Luna · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best low-budget pick for SMBs: Market Dojo — described as “affordable” and “self-service” e-sourcing software for SMBs” Perplexity Sonar · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · first choice
“Market Dojo is a highly popular, lightweight e-sourcing platform tailored perfectly for the mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Do compare mid-market-focused platforms like Ivalua, JAGGAER, GEP SMART, Market Dojo, Tradogram” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named Market Dojo and are not a share of its labels.
130 of the 139 domain citations in answers naming Market Dojo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 68 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | Strategic sourcing | |
| Blog | 48 | 1 | 2026-08-25 | Strategic sourcing | |
| Case study | 35 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| Conference or event | 20 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 0 | 2025-12-11 | Strategic sourcing | |
| News or press | 10 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 7 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2025-11-21 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2019-02-06 |
Every page marketdojo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Market Dojo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: marketdojo.com, marketdojo.com/pricing-enterprise, trust.marketdojo.com, marketdojo.com/product, marketdojo.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Market Dojo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Market Dojo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Market Dojo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: