Telecom expense management for small business buyers
Asked as “telecom expense management platform”, and as “wireless and telecom bill management service”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
36%
Contested · Lightyear 12%
36Genuity12Lightyear08vManager44others
36% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Genuity vs CaleroGenuity vs BrightfinGenuity vs SakonLightyear vs vCom SolutionsLightyear vs MindglobalLightyear vs CaleroLightyear vs BrightfinLightyear vs SakonvCom Solutions vs MindglobalvCom Solutions vs CalerovCom Solutions vs BrightfinvCom Solutions vs SakonMindglobal vs CaleroMindglobal vs BrightfinMindglobal vs SakonCalero vs BrightfinCalero vs SakonBrightfin vs Sakon
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02v03
E04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Genuity36%
Genuity36%02Lightyear12%
Lightyear12%03vManager8%
04ExpenseLogic6%
05Zoho Expense4%
Zoho Expense4%06Calero2%
Calero2%07Brightfin0%
Brightfin0%08Sakon0%
Sakon0%09Tangoe One Telecom0%
Tangoe One Telecom0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tangoe One Telecom84%
31 of 37 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Tangoe has legacy architecture that requires significant manual data entry during implementation... It's particularly problematic for small to mid-sized companies” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Calero78%
28 of 36 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Platforms like Tangoe or Calero are not "set-it-and-forget-it". They are complex databases that usually require 1 to 4 dedicated, full-time internal employees” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Sakon80%
16 of 20 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“The "Enterprise Giants" (Tangoe, Calero, Sakon, Cass, Tellennium) ... generally a poor fit—and often won't even accept—small businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Calero-MDSL
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“such as Tangoe, Calero-MDSL, or Sakon—are generally not viable options” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1090 links across 172 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
52 answers · 81 citations · 13 models
36 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
35 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GetApp34 answers · 58 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G232 answers · 64 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Lightyear29 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 33 citations · 8 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Expensify24 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 12 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
46 answers · 12 models
36 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 8 models
22 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 11 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platform”, “telecom expense management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genuity gogenuity.com | 36% | 62 | 4,400 | 189 | 1,691 | 0 | |
| Lightyear lightyear.ai Lightyear 12%, Lightyear.ai 2% | 14% | 71 | 33,100 | 17,745 | 33,552 | 22 | 4 |
| vManager | 8% | 110 | 24 | ||||
| ExpenseLogic | 6% | 10 | 0 | ||||
| Zoho parent site Zoho Expense 4% | 4% | 186 | 5,400 | 52 | |||
| Motus MMS | 4% | ||||||
| vCom Solutions vcomsolutions.com | 2% | 32 | 260 | 4 | 263 | ||
| Datagate | 2% | ||||||
| Valicom valicomtech.com | 2% | 13 | 90 | 0 | 151 | 0 | |
| Clearview | 2% | 27,100 | 2,426 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (lightyear.ai, uplandsoftware.com, use.expensify.com). The first result for “best telecom expense management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best telecom expense management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which wireless and telecom bill management service would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top telecom expense management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best telecom expense management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a telecom expense management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which telecom expense management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5GenuityBluLogixChangedGenuityagainst: Tangoe One TelecomGenuityno first choiceagainst: Calero-MDSL, Genuity, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Lightyear, MotusTwo alternatives
Rev.io, Telgoo5Two alternatives
Brightfin, SakonTwo alternatives
Cimpl, iSimplexityGPT-5.4 minivManageragainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomvManagerHeldagainst: OneBillGenuityagainst: Calero-MDSLvManageragainst: Motusno first choiceagainst: CallTrackingMetrics, Clearview, GoTo / GoTo Connect, Telnyx, ThingsMobile, Upland Cimpl
Four alternatives
Brightfin, Clearview, Datagate, TemforceOne alternative
SakonThree alternatives
Brightfin, Lightyear, SakonOne alternative
SpikeFli AnalyticsGemini 3.5 FlashLightyear.aiagainst: Calero-MDSL, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomDatagate, GoGenuityChangedagainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomLightyearagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomGenuityagainst: Calero-MDSL, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomClearview, vCom Solutionsagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecomagainst: Calero, Cass, Expensify, Ramp, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Tellennium
Three alternatives
Cimpl, Genuity, vCom SolutionsFive alternatives
Lightyear.ai, One.TelcoBill, OneBill, TELCLOUD, vCom SolutionsSix alternatives
Expensify, Ramp, Rippling, Valicom, Wireless Watchdogs, vManagerFour alternatives
Expensify, Lightyear, Ramp, Zoho ExpenseSeven alternatives
AT&T Premier, BILL Spend & Expense, Expensify, Lightyear.ai, Ramp, Rippling, Verizon EnterprisePerplexity SonarGenuitySutiWEM-SChangedExpenseLogic, Genuityagainst: Softeligent, Tangoe One TelecomGenuityagainst: Microcallno first choiceagainst: Brightfin, Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, vManager
Three alternatives
Brightfin, ExpenseLogic, vManagerThree alternatives
Cimpl, Comview, RadiusPointTwo alternatives
LINQ Qonnect, MicrocallOne alternative
ExpenseLogicGrok 4.1 FastGenuityagainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomCaleroChangedLightyear, Zoho Expenseagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomLightyearagainst: Calero, Navan, Tangoe One Telecom, Zoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: Calero, Mindglobal, Sakon, Tangoe TEM
Two alternatives
ExpenseLogic, LightyearThree alternatives
Cass Information Systems, Tangoe One Telecom, Upland CimplThree alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Genuity, MobilOne alternative
GenuityMistral SmallExpenseLogicno first choiceChangedGenuityGenuityno first choiceagainst: Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Three alternatives
Calero, Sierra Gold, Upland CimplThree alternatives
ClearSight TEMs, Foresight & Capstone Partners, TemforceDeepSeek V4 FlashLightyearagainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomLightyearHeldagainst: Tangoe One TelecomUpland Cimpl, Valicomagainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomLightyearExpenseLogic, RadiusPointagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe TEM, Telesoft
One alternative
CimplFour alternatives
Brightfin, Calero, Genuity, OneBillOne alternative
LightyearTwo alternatives
Genuity, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
Brightfin, Temforce, Zoho ExpenseLlama 4 MaverickValicomMotus MMSChangedClearSight TEMs, GenuityGenuityno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Tangoe Telecom Expense ManagementThree alternatives
Calero, Tangoe One Telecom, TeligisticsQwen 3.7 FlashGenuityagainst: Zoho ExpenseBillmonitorChangedagainst: Baker TillyGenuity, Lightyearagainst: Calero, Tangoe One TelecomGenuityno first choiceagainst: Calero, DMI, Tangoe One Telecom, Upland Cimplagainst: Calero, Mindglobal, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom, Upland Cimpl
Two alternatives
Brightfin, Leverage TechnologyFive alternatives
Foresight Systems, IntegriBill, Ordway, Sigma Voice, Socium ITOne alternative
Leverage TechnologyFour alternatives
AT&T Connect TEM, My Telecom Expenses, Temponomy, Verizon Business TEM ServicesKimi K2Genuity, Lightyearagainst: Calero, TellenniumLightyearChangedagainst: Calero, Cass Information Systems, Tangoe One Telecom, Zoho ExpenseTemforceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom, TellenniumGenuityno first choicenothing named
One alternative
BrightfinThree alternatives
Genuity IT Admin Suite, LINQ Qonnect, vManagerThree alternatives
Brightfin, Cimpl, Zoho ExpenseGLM 4.7 FlashXExpenseLogicZOEYChangedvManagervManagerno first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecom
Four alternatives
Brightfin, Motus, OneBill, Zoho ExpenseThree alternatives
One.TelcoBill, Optivolt Billing, ViiBE by ViirtueThree alternatives
Lightyear, Motus, SpikeFli AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Genuity, Zoho ExpenseMiniMax M2.5Genuity, Zoho ExpenseMotus MMS, TellenniumChangedGenuityGenuityagainst: Calero, Tie, Valicomno first choiceagainst: Calero, Genuity, Tangoe One Telecom
Two alternatives
Lightyear, Tangoe One TelecomOne alternative
TeligisticsFour alternatives
ExpenseLogic, Mobil, SpikeFli Analytics, Zoho ExpenseGPT-6 LunaGenuityTRAK CommunicationsChangedGenuity, Lightyearagainst: Calero, ExpenseLogic, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomGenuityno first choiceagainst: Brightfin, Calero, Sakon TEM, Tangoe One Telecom, Upland Cimpl
Two alternatives
VirsaTel, vCom vManagerTwo alternatives
Datagate, SimpleTekOne alternative
vCom SolutionsMuse Glimmer 30BGenuityagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomDatagate Telecom BillingChangedGenuity, Lightyearagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One TelecomGenuity, Zoho Expenseno first choiceagainst: Calero, Tangoe One Telecomagainst: Calero, Sakon, Tangoe One Telecom
Two alternatives
Lightyear, Zoho ExpenseOne alternative
Visage Mobile's MobilityCentralFour alternatives
OneBill, SpikeFli Analytics, Vigilis, vManagerThree alternatives
Cimpl, DMI, TellenniumBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:24 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:48 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:52 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:17 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 13 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:25 | yes | 22 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:03 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:08 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:52 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:32 | yes | 14 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:23 | yes | 3 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:11 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:21 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:19 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:21 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:44 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:16 | yes | 25 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:58 | yes | 14 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 5 | 57 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:18 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:11 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:39 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:43 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:27 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 22 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:36 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 22 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:28 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:18 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:54 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 18 | 137 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:15 | yes | 18 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:51 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:44 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:45 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:09 | yes | 1 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:56 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 18 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:12 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:05 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:33 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:36 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:24 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:32 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:28 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:26 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:06 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:55 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:30 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:39 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:17 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:23 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:52 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:32 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:18 | yes | 21 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:17 | yes | 13 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:42 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 7 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:27 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:23 | yes | 1 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:25 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:09 | yes | 6 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:47 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:13 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:14 | yes | 22 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:06 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:24 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 24 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:57 | yes | 22 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:05 | yes | 24 | 80 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:22 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:46 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Tangoe read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe (Tangoe TEM) read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe (now part of Cognizant) read as Tangoe One Telecom
Tangoe One read as Tangoe One Telecom
vCom read as vCom Solutions
Unresolved, counted raw
AOTMP
AT&T Business
AT&T Connect TEM
AT&T Premier
Baker Tilly
Billingbooth
Billmonitor
BluLogix
CallTrackingMetrics (CTM)
Cerillion's Revenue Manager
ClipOne
Datagate Telecom Billing
Foresight & Capstone Partners
Foresight Systems
Genuity IT Admin Suite
GoGenuity (Genuity)
GoTo / GoTo Connect
IntegriBill
Mobalytics
My Telecom Expenses (by Tempest)
Optivolt Billing
Sakon TEM
Sakon Telecom Expense Management (TEM)
Setyl
Sigma Voice
SimpleTek
Softeligent
SonderMind
TELCLOUD (Telco Bill Center)
TRAK Communications
Tangoe Telecom Expense Management
Telesoft
Telgoo5
Telnyx
Temponomy
ThingsMobile
Tie
Traction
Verizon Business TEM Services
ViiBE by Viirtue
VirsaTel
Visage Mobile's MobilityCentral
Wavenet
Wireless Watchdogs
ZOEY (by Tekton Billing)
iSimplexity
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.