| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 14% | 2 of 108 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 16% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 6% | 5 of 101 | 0% | 20 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 5%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 2% | 11 of 79 | 0% | 23 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 2% | 12 of 124 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 28 of 83 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 74 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 61 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow forecasting | 10% | 5% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 5%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 5 of 101 |
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 124, unchanged |
| Accounts receivable auto | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 of 79, unchanged |
| B2B credit management | 16% | 14% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 16% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 2 of 108 |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 28 of 83 |
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 74 of 82 |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 94, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tesorio: Best for mid-market B2B companies with 5-to-50-person finance teams, offering rapid deployment and structured workflow management” Mistral Small · B2B credit management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Tesorio is consistently positioned as the AR-native cash forecasting platform for B2B SaaS and mid-market finance teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cash flow forecasting · direct prompt · first choice
“1. Tesorio - Tesorio is an AI-powered order-to-cash platform best suited for mid-market B2B companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · B2B credit management · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for: B2B SaaS and services companies ($20M to $1B ARR) where customer collections dictate liquidity.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“still requires significant manual intervention for payment matching and exceptions, which may not fully address the need for automation” Mistral Small · Cash application · direct prompt · soft negative
“Several reviewers mentioned glitches and delays in platform access, and the platform will frequently log out users in between tasks.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 153 of the 158 answers that named Tesorio and are not a share of its labels.
427 of the 503 domain citations in answers naming Tesorio came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 333 | 12 | 2026-09-15 | Cash flow forecasting, Accounts receivable auto | |
| Glossary or explainer | 64 | undated | Cash application, Procure-to-pay | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Case study | 9 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | Cash application | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page tesorio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Tesorio's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: tesorio.com, tesorio.com/product/workflows, tesorio.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tesorio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tesorio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tesorio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Tesorio is among the products AI models recommend first in B2B credit management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.