Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 31 → 59 of 97
CCH Axcess Tax
9Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CCH Axcess Tax was named 7 times in Corporate tax provision, where Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business88 of 108
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 102
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In corporate tax provision · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CCH Axcess Tax for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate tax provision | Tax and compliance | 0% | 22 of 102 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CCH Axcess Tax held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate tax provision · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 24 → 19 of 94
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate tax provision | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 22 of 102 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CCH Axcess Tax across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CCH Axcess Tax across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“consider it if your returns are comparatively straightforward or an outside accounting firm will prepare them” GPT-6 Luna · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Mid-sized firms with complex U.S. returns | Pro-grade diagnostics, workflow automation” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“CCH Axcess Tax may be better since many firms already use it.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for: Mid-sized firms wanting cloud-native integration” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“CCH Axcess Tax is therefore more return-preparation / firm-workflow oriented than a pure ASC 740 provision engine.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate tax provision · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CCH Axcess Tax, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CCH Axcess Tax was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CCH Axcess Tax, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CCH Axcess Tax was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CCH Axcess Tax. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named CCH Axcess Tax and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gitnux.org7
tax.thomsonreuters.com7
theaccountingclub.net6
zipdo.co6
wifitalents.com5
worldmetrics.org5
g2.com4
fueler.io3
guideflow.com3
statwharf.com3
No domain is on file for CCH Axcess Tax, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as CCH Axcess Tax
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CCH Axcess Tax; a claim can dispute any of them.
CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer) 2
Follow CCH Axcess Tax
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CCH Axcess Tax's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CCH Axcess Tax, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CCH Axcess Tax by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CCH Axcess Tax is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CCH Axcess Tax, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.