AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Corefy · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Corefy

58Judge labels
9First choices
8Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Payment orchestration for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 81 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Corefy →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In payment orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Corefy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Payment orchestration platformsReceivables and billing4%9 of 8110%21accepted challenger
Embedded payments platformsReceivables and billing0%41 of 1100%1under 10 labels · led by Stripe Connect at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Corefy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Corefy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00202
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small10113
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX20103
MiniMax M2.511002
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase10 labels2
Comparative18 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels7
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Corefy if: You're a PSP or white-label business needing deep routing control and multiple provider management.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Payment orchestration · comparative prompt · first choice
“Corefy and Dodo Payments are excellent choices for a dedicated multi-processor payment routing layer” Mistral Small · Payment orchestration · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My top pick for most mid-sized B2B companies would be Corefy” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Payment orchestration · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For full orchestration & control: Corefy” MiniMax M2.5 · Payment orchestration · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it may not be the best fit for businesses seeking granular control or transparent pricing” Mistral Small · Payment orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative
“While competitors like Corefy charge €2,500+/month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Payment orchestration · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Corefy, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Corefy was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Spreedly44 of 586Not among the top eight
Primer38 of 586Not among the top eight
Solidgate31 of 584Not among the top eight
IXOPAY31 of 583Not among the top eight
Gr4vy27 of 581Not among the top eight
Adyen22 of 583Not among the top eight
Yuno19 of 582Not among the top eight
Stripe16 of 581Not among the top eight
Checkout.com15 of 580Not among the top eight
BlueSnap11 of 582Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Corefy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 58 answers that named Corefy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com48
whop.com47
corefy.comYour site34
solidgate.com32
ilounge.com31
dodopayments.com29
techrepublic.com23
chargeback.io21
devopsschool.com21
primer.io20

272 of the 306 domain citations in answers naming Corefy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

corefy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Corefy takes 4% of first choices and BlueSnap takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “payment orchestration platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “payment orchestration platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90 a month (“corefy”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,965 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,991 · 40 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,214
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 81 in payment orchestration
Segment leader
18%
BlueSnap
First choices
9 across its categories
Named in
58 answers
Its own site cited
in 58 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on corefy.com
1,609
subdomains included
Content
436
counted in the table below
Documentation
671
Product · Integration
39 · 372
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer209982026-09-09
Blog16472026-09-10
Comparison1882026-09-03
Report or ebook16undated
Case study1112026-07-01
Podcast or video10undated
Template or tool802026-03-12
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page corefy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Corefy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Corefy is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Payment Orchestration Platform
For
payment teams
Price stated
Flexible pricing for businesses of any size. Pay monthly or annually with no long-term commitment. corefy.com/pricing
Starting price
10,000 corefy.com/pricing
Integrations claimed
600 corefy.com · 650 corefy.com/pricing pages disagree
Certifications
PCI DSS Level 1ISO 9001ISO 27001PSD2GDPR
Customers named
Kuna.ioLetyShopsBoostaGrand Cru ConceptsCoffeeokKuna
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, hosting

What Corefy's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: corefy.com, corefy.com/pricing, corefy.com/docs/products/account/security, corefy.com/use-cases/payment-sdks, corefy.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Corefy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Corefy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Corefy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Corefy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Corefy, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at corefy.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.