| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payment orchestration platforms | Receivables and billing | 4% | 9 of 81 | 10% | 21 | accepted challenger | |
| Embedded payments platforms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 41 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Stripe Connect at 53% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Corefy if: You're a PSP or white-label business needing deep routing control and multiple provider management.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Payment orchestration · comparative prompt · first choice
“Corefy and Dodo Payments are excellent choices for a dedicated multi-processor payment routing layer” Mistral Small · Payment orchestration · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My top pick for most mid-sized B2B companies would be Corefy” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Payment orchestration · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For full orchestration & control: Corefy” MiniMax M2.5 · Payment orchestration · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“it may not be the best fit for businesses seeking granular control or transparent pricing” Mistral Small · Payment orchestration · negative prompt · soft negative
“While competitors like Corefy charge €2,500+/month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Payment orchestration · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 58 answers that named Corefy and are not a share of its labels.
272 of the 306 domain citations in answers naming Corefy came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 209 | 98 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Blog | 164 | 7 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Comparison | 18 | 8 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 16 | undated | |||
| Case study | 11 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 10 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 8 | 0 | 2026-03-12 |
Every page corefy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Corefy's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: corefy.com, corefy.com/pricing, corefy.com/docs/products/account/security, corefy.com/use-cases/payment-sdks, corefy.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Corefy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Corefy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Corefy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: