| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 6% | 5 of 94 | 20% | 49 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Payment orchestration platforms | Receivables and billing | 4% | 10 of 81 | 12% | 17 | accepted challenger | |
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 2% | 13 of 78 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cross-border payments and FX | Treasury and cash | 0% | 12 of 87 | 7% | 29 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Merchants of record | Receivables and billing | 0% | 41 of 45 | 38% | 13 | criticized challenger | |
| Contractor payments | Spend and procurement | 0% | 94 of 98 | 71% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Tipalti at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B BNPL and net terms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 19 of 90 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Resolve Pay at 56% | |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 52 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 42 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payment orchestration | 0% | 5% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now. | New this edition | Rank 10 of 81, unchanged |
| B2B payment acceptance | 7% | 7% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 5 of 94 |
| SaaS metrics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 58 → 13 of 78 |
| Cross-border payments | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 12 of 87 |
| Merchants of record | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 45, unchanged |
| Contractor payments | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 94 of 98 |
| B2B BNPL and terms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 19 of 90, unchanged |
| Business bill pay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 52 of 98, unchanged |
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 70 → 42 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 14 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 13 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 11 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you're an online SaaS or e-commerce platform accepting B2B payments from customers → Stripe (flexibility) or Adyen (scale & lower cross-border fees).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · first choice
“If your primary goal is collecting card/ACH payments from your customers: Choose Stripe (for digital/SaaS models)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · first choice
“Accept payments from business customers online or inside a product: compare Stripe and Adyen.” GPT-6 Luna · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · first choice
“Stripe is the safest default for a limited-budget company because it offers pay-as-you-go pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · Payment orchestration · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Not a true reseller/MoR model — you'd still own tax compliance responsibilities.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Merchants of record · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“do not use their default dashboard for financial planning or investor decks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative
“PayPal & Stripe (Avoid for Large, Low-Volume B2B Invoices)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · hard negative
“simple, out-of-the-box Stripe dashboards usually break because of multi-year contracts, custom ramp schedules, manual invoices, and multi-currency billing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS metrics · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 361 of the 386 answers that named Stripe and are not a share of its labels.
831 of the 933 domain citations in answers naming Stripe came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,705 | 12 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 580 | undated | |||
| News or press | 317 | 9 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 226 | 1 | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 209 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 93 | 8 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Conference or event | 43 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 17 | 1 | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2024-04-16 |
Every page stripe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Stripe's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: stripe.com, stripe.com/pricing, trust.stripe.com, stripe.com/platforms, stripe.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Stripe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Stripe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Stripe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: