Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Easy Board · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Easy Board

2Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Easy Board was named 2 times in Board portals, where OnBoard led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market13 of 50

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In board portals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Easy Board for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Board portals	Equity and corporate	2%	13 of 50	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 49%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Easy Board yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Easy Board across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your budget is tight, Easy Board looks like the best fit overall.” GPT-5.4 mini · Board portals · budget prompt · first choice

“Easy Board (Best for small boards & ease of use)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board portals · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Easy Board, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Easy Board was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BoardPro2 of 21Not among the top eight

BoardCloud1 of 21Not among the top eight

BoardSpot1 of 20Not among the top eight

Boardable1 of 20Not among the top eight

Google Workspace for Nonprofits1 of 20Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Easy Board. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Easy Board and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

boardable.com1

boardcloud.org1

boardcloud.us1

boardpro.com1

boardroompro.org1

easyboard.comYour site1

idealsboard.com1

imboard.ai1

nonprofitpro.com1

Ten of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Easy Board came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

boardable.com/1

boardable.com/plans1

boardcloud.org/news/posts/our-journey-from-unlimited-to-a-per-seat-pricing-model1

boardcloud.us/board-portal-pricing/competitive-costs1

boardpro.com/boardpro-vs-onboard1

boardpro.com/pricing1

boardroompro.org/boardpro1

easyboard.com/faq1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on easyboard.com

124

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	77	2	2026-08-12
Comparison	2	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	undated
Template or tool	1	0	2025-07-02

Most recent

2026-08-12Signs your nonprofit needs board management software blog
2026-08-10Beyond deadlines how nonprofit leaders can strengthen teams through project management and supervision blog
2026-06-02Nonprofit board governance glossary blog
2026-05-13Reaching the next generation of nonprofit board members and donors blog
2026-04-09How to strengthen board engagement in nonprofits 2026 and beyond blog
2026-03-18Easy board awarded 2026 best value and shortlist best user rated board management software in the world again blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page easyboard.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Easy Board

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Easy Board is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Easy board meeting management software. Connect your nonprofit, association, or for-profit board, committees, documents, and meetings all in one place.
easyboard.com
For: board admin, nonprofit leader, or assistant
easyboard.com
Price stated: Mini $49/month; $588/year; Base $159/month; $1,908/year; Pro $399/month; $4,788/year; Max $799/month; $9,588/year easyboard.com/pricing
Starting price: 49 easyboard.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: 90 Day Free Trial easyboard.com
Certifications: WCAG 2.2 AAGDPR In ProgressSOC 2 Type II In Progress
Customers named: YMCAinform-usauniversity of michigannonprofit-hubChildrensunited-wayBoysGirlsClubMadera County Workforce
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What Easy Board's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: easyboard.com, easyboard.com/pricing, trust.easyboard.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Easy Board's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Easy Board, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Easy Board by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Easy Board is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Easy Board, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.