Finance AI Index

Index › Products › BoardCloud · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

BoardCloud

9Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BoardCloud was named 4 times in Board portals and 1 other category, where OnBoard led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business11 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 50

under the label threshold

Enterprise22 of 48

under the label threshold

In board portals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BoardCloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Board portals	Equity and corporate	2%	12 of 50	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 49%
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	45 of 99	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BoardCloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BoardCloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“BoardCloud (Best overall value for small-to-medium teams)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board portals · budget prompt · first choice

“BoardCloud is highlighted for its extremely affordable plans and strong data security” Mistral Small · Board portals · budget prompt · alternative

“Starting from $9.99/user/month with unlimited user access.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Board · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BoardCloud, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BoardCloud was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BoardPro6 of 92Not among the top eight

Boardable5 of 92Not among the top eight

Diligent Boards5 of 91Not among the top eight

Nasdaq Boardvantage5 of 90Not among the top eight

OnBoard5 of 90Not among the top eight

BoardEffect4 of 90Not among the top eight

Govenda3 of 91Not among the top eight

Google Workspace2 of 90Not among the top eight

Microsoft 3652 of 90Not among the top eight

Boardly1 of 91Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BoardCloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named BoardCloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boardcloud.usYour site8

fast.io5

g2.com5

board-room.org4

softwaretestinghelp.com4

boardintelligence.com3

boardpro.com3

getapp.com3

guideflow.com3

onboardmeetings.com3

Thirty-three of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming BoardCloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

fast.io/resources/board-portal-comparison5

boardcloud.us/board-portal-pricing/competitive-costs3

fast.io/resources/board-portal-software3

onboardmeetings.com/blog/best-board-portals3

softwaretestinghelp.com/best-board-management-software3

board-room.org/blog/board-reporting-software2

boardable.com/plans2

boardcloud.us/board-portal-pricing/competitive-costs/detailed-board-portal-comparison2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

boardcloud.us ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BoardCloud takes 2% of first choices and OnBoard takes 49%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “board portal”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “board portals”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 12 of 50 in board portals

Segment leader

49%

OnBoard

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 9 answers
Its own site cited: in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on boardcloud.us

337

subdomains included

Content

124

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

66 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
News or press	94	6	2026-09-07
Glossary or explainer	11	undated
Blog	10	undated
Report or ebook	5	undated
Comparison	4	undated

Most recent

2026-09-07Use board onboarding surveys to improve new director integration news or press
2026-08-31How to measure your boards risk appetite before it costs you news or press
2026-08-31Simplify board forms and surveys with boardcloud news or press
2026-08-11The hidden logic of shadow ai news or press
2026-08-03Governance of ai ai risk explained simply news or press
2026-07-27The two ai conversations boards need to separate news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page boardcloud.us exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow BoardCloud

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

BoardCloud is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Secure board portal software & meeting tools
boardcloud.us
For: boards
boardcloud.us/pricingcomparisonnew
Price stated: Affordable Pricing Model boardcloud.us
Free plan or trial: Free Trial boardcloud.us
Integrations claimed: 3 boardcloud.us/features/board-portal/integrations
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, certifications, hosting, customers

What BoardCloud's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: boardcloud.us, boardcloud.us/pricingcomparisonnew, boardcloud.us/features/board-portal/security, boardcloud.us/features, boardcloud.us/features/board-portal/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BoardCloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BoardCloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BoardCloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where BoardCloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name BoardCloud, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.