| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embedded payments platforms | Receivables and billing | 14% | 2 of 110 | 7% | 45 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Finix (Best for Flexibility & Mid-Market Revenue Share)... Choose Finix if you want to aggressively monetize payment volume through a generous revenue share model.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded payments · direct prompt · first choice
“Finix is the best PayFac-as-a-Service provider if you want to own the payments experience, maximize revenue share” Mistral Small · Embedded payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Programmable infrastructure with interchange-plus pricing; designed for platforms needing granular control.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Embedded payments · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd put Finix first on the shortlist for a mid-sized U.S. B2B platform.” GPT-6 Luna · Embedded payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid for tight budgets: Finix ($250+/mo)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Embedded payments · budget prompt · hard negative
“Usio says Clearent/Finix are good for card processing and ISV onboarding, but "lack outbound functionality."” Perplexity Sonar · Embedded payments · negative prompt · soft negative
“frequent complaints about monthly minimums, sales-led onboarding, and pricing opacity” Mistral Small · Embedded payments · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 127 of the 129 answers that named Finix and are not a share of its labels.
509 of the 595 domain citations in answers naming Finix came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 157 | 0 | 2024-04-18 | ||
| Blog | 113 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 100 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 58 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| News or press | 31 | 3 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 23 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Every page finix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Finix's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: finix.com, finix.com/pricing, trust.finix.com, finix.com/solutions/api, finix.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Finix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Finix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Finix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Finix is among the products AI models recommend first in Embedded payments platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.