Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 123 → 106 of 109
1 category · Named, not rankedFIS Integrity
15Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FIS Integrity was named 4 times in Treasury management syst, where Trovata led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business113 of 117
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market122 of 124
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise89 of 90
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named FIS Integrity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 122 of 124 | 75% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, FIS Integrity held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 115 → 113 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 26 → 81 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 115 → 122 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated FIS Integrity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated FIS Integrity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“FIS Integrity suits mid-market to large enterprise corporate treasury teams managing complex, multi-entity operations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Legacy / On-Premise Systems (e.g., FIS Integrity, IT2, older SunGard/Prophix) Caution level: High — if you are evaluating these today, reconsider” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · hard negative
“like Kyriba, FIS Integrity, or ION Treasury are generally out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · hard negative
“Heavy implementation ... may be excessive for corporates” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FIS Integrity, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FIS Integrity was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FIS Integrity, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FIS Integrity was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FIS Integrity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named FIS Integrity and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
checkthat.ai9
centime.com8
debtbook.com8
g2.com7
myhospitalnow.com7
trovata.io6
finantrix.com5
highradius.com5
linkedin.com5
nomentia.com5
Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming FIS Integrity came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
fisglobal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FIS Integrity takes 0% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
fisglobal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FIS Integrity takes 0% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “treasury management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “treasury management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“fis integrity”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 71 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 175,497 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,053 · 990 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 11,973
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 122 of 124 in treasury management syst
Segment leader
28%
Trovata
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on fisglobal.com
1,871
subdomains included
Content
732
counted in the table below
Documentation
11
Product · Integration
184 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 304 | undated | |||
| Blog | 303 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 48 | 0 | 2026-05-26 | ||
| Conference or event | 34 | 3 | 2026-10-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 29 | 0 | 2024-07-08 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01UW Milwaukee Business Communications Internship Career Fair conference or event
- 2026-09-30UNF Business Career Fair conference or event
- 2026-09-30FAMU Career and Internship Expo conference or event
- 2026-06-03United business bank blog
- 2026-05-26Scaling total portfolio management agentic ai webinar or virtual event
- 2026-05-15Private markets growth scaling for investor success blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 8, 2026Goldman Sachs Communicopia + Technology conferenceSan Francisco · spoke
- May 19, 2026J.P. Morgan 54th Annual Global Technology, Media and Communications Conferenceplace not stated · spoke
As the event pages on fisglobal.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fisglobal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow FIS Integrity
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
FIS Integrity is its own company.ShowHide
The company
FIS Integrity is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Customers named
- Avidia BankPrimeSouth Bank
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What FIS Integrity's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: fisglobal.com, fisglobal.com/products/epic, fisglobal.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FIS Integrity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FIS Integrity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FIS Integrity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where FIS Integrity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name FIS Integrity, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.