2 categories · RankedForter
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce fraud prevention | Receivables and billing | 0% | 22 of 70 | 39% | 33 | criticized challenger | |
| Chargeback management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 24 of 81 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Forter across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Forter if you are a large enterprise, have high-value luxury goods” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · comparative prompt · first choice
“Trade-off: Premium pricing and opaque decisioning. Best for large merchants prioritizing automation over explainability.” Kimi K2 · Ecommerce fraud · comparative prompt · alternative
“Try Forter if you operate at enterprise scale with complex identity, payment, and policy-abuse signals.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Ecommerce fraud · comparative prompt · alternative
“Known for speed and scale, but its blackbox model means you don't get explanations for decisions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise platforms (Signifyd, Forter, Riskified) often require sales calls and custom contracts averaging $80K+/year” Kimi K2 · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · soft negative
“Forter is a leading identity graph platform but is commonly described as enterprise-priced for mid-market” Muse Glimmer 30B · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · soft negative
“large enterprise tools (like Forter or traditional Kount) have high monthly retainer fees ($5,000+/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · budget prompt · soft negative
“Forter's required integration and custom pricing model make it less suitable for smaller businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Forter, over the 107 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Forter was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 107 answers that named Forter and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
406 of the 406 domain citations in answers naming Forter came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
forter.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Forter takes 0% of first choices and SEON takes 16%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“forter”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 98 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,728 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 288 · 21 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,800
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 107 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 101 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 477 | 12 | 2026-10-01 | Ecommerce fraud | |
| Case study | 44 | 1 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 8 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2026-04-15 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2022-10-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01Psd3 psr merchants guide 2 blog
- 2026-10-01Ai agent order data blog
- 2026-09-24Forter com blog ai assistants agentic checkout blog
- 2026-09-16Ai christmas shopping uk survey blog
- 2026-09-165 impact europe takeaways blog
- 2026-09-10Increase authorization rates pre auth fraud blog
Events in person
- October 14, 2026Impact NYCNew York City · hosts
- September 10, 2026 to September 11, 2026Impact ChinaChengdu, China · hosted
- September 8, 2026Impact EuropeLondon · hosted
As the event pages on forter.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page forter.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Forter
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Forter is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic intelligence you can trust
- For
- digital commerce
- Certifications
- PCI DSS Level 1SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001GDPRCCPA
- Customers named
- NordstromASOSeBayPricelineSephoraInstacartAdobeWayfair
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Forter's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: forter.com, forter.com/pricing, forter.com/trust, forter.com/platform, forter.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Forter's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Forter, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Forter by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Forter is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Forter, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.