AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Sift · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Sift

161Judge labels
10First choices
37Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Ecommerce fraud for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 16% of its 44 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Sift →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ecommerce fraud · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sift for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Ecommerce fraud preventionReceivables and billing4%8 of 7016%44accepted challenger
Chargeback managementReceivables and billing0%18 of 810%7under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24%
AML and transaction monitoringTax and compliance0%59 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sift yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sift across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501113
GPT-5.4 mini13004
Gemini 3.5 Flash02114
Perplexity Sonar02103
Grok 4.1 Fast21115
Mistral Small02204
DeepSeek V4 Flash02114
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash01113
Kimi K205117
GLM 4.7 FlashX02103
MiniMax M2.503205
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B11114

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct32 labels6
Paraphrase18 labels1
Comparative47 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels3
Scale-constrained24 labelsNone
Negative27 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative161 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Sift for most mid-market B2B ecommerce—it's consistently #1 in G2 rankings for balanced performance without overkill.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · first choice
“Sift maintains #1 position across all fraud prevention categories in G2's Fall 2025 Reports” Muse Glimmer 30B · Ecommerce fraud · comparative prompt · first choice
“Sift - Top-rated on G2 for real-time detection.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce fraud · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best all-around choice is usually Sift” GPT-5.4 mini · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Can be complex to configure; occasional false positives requiring manual review. Not ideal for very small teams due to setup overhead.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative
“Unlike consumer-focused tools (like Sift or Stripe Radar), these are specifically designed for B2B payment workflows” Kimi K2 · Ecommerce fraud · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Some users note that the system can occasionally generate false positives, which may require additional review time.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sift has received significant criticism from users regarding inaccuracy and false positives” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sift, over the 161 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sift was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Kount88 of 1611Not among the top eight
Riskified85 of 1618Not among the top eight
Forter81 of 1612Not among the top eight
SEON70 of 16110Compare →
Chargeflow28 of 1612Not among the top eight
Fingerprint21 of 1610Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sift. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 153 of the 161 answers that named Sift and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com104
fraud.net88
cside.com62
learn.g2.com58
clickpost.ai54
guideflow.com54
fingerprint.com51
stripe.com49
seon.io46
shuftipro.com43

609 of the 609 domain citations in answers naming Sift came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sift.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Sift takes 4% of first choices and SEON takes 16%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ecommerce fraud prevention platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ecommerce fraud prevention platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
27,100 a month (“sift”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
5,273 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 16,711 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,146 · 129 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,940
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
46 ads · 28 text, 14 image, 4 video · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2023, as Sift, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 13 in the year, 33 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 70 in ecommerce fraud
Segment leader
16%
SEON
First choices
10 across its categories
Named in
161 answers
Its own site cited
in 153 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sift.com
861
subdomains included
Content
718
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
19 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog528152026-10-02Ecommerce fraud
Webinar or virtual event4642026-09-16
Case study4202025-07-15
Report or ebook3312026-07-31Ecommerce fraud
Podcast or video2802025-10-02
Glossary or explainer1912026-09-28
Conference or event1012026-09-28
Comparison802025-03-16
Template or tool202025-09-16
News or press2undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sift.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Sift

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sift; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sift (formerly Sift Science) 1

Follow Sift

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sift is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Fraud Prevention Platform for Digital Business
For
Digital business
Certifications
CPFPP Certification
Customers named
HertzYelpPoshmarkPatreonPaula's ChoiceSmartproxyTuroSkill Share
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Sift's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sift.com, sift.com/platform, sift.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sift's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sift, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sift by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sift is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sift, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sift.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.