| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce fraud prevention | Receivables and billing | 16% | 1 of 70 | 12% | 34 | accepted challenger | |
| AML and transaction monitoring | Tax and compliance | 0% | 31 of 108 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33% | |
| Chargeback management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 29 of 81 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SEON offers modular fraud prevention tools with a free tier... particularly accessible to small and mid-market businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce fraud · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with ClearSale or SEON as they specifically target mid-market businesses” MiniMax M2.5 · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · first choice
“SEON is highly recommended for mid-market B2B companies that have an in-house operations or risk team” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest default choice is SEON if you want an API-first, fast-deploying platform” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“SEON is often featured for flexible fraud signals, but it is not as clearly the cheapest option” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce fraud · budget prompt · soft negative
“SEON — Mixed Reviews (21% 1-star ratings) ... blackbox nature (opaque ML models)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative
“Examples of platforms using this model: Sift, Kount, SEON, Forter” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative
“custom quotes possible but higher entry” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce fraud · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 116 of the 121 answers that named SEON and are not a share of its labels.
466 of the 513 domain citations in answers naming SEON came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 535 | 12 | 2026-10-02 | Chargeback management | |
| News or press | 122 | 11 | 2026-09-29 | Chargeback management | |
| Case study | 54 | 2 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 50 | 3 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 38 | 2 | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Comparison | 31 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 0 | 2026-01-30 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2025-12-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2022-04-11 |
Every page seon.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What SEON's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: seon.io, seon.io/pricing, trust.seon.io, seon.io/products/case-management, seon.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SEON's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SEON, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SEON by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend SEON first in Ecommerce fraud prevention this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.