AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Fundbox · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Fundbox

39Judge labels
3First choices
18Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in B2B BNPL and terms for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 90 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Fundbox →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In b2b bnpl and terms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Fundbox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
B2B BNPL and net termsReceivables and billing2%7 of 9014%14accepted challenger
Accounts receivable automationReceivables and billing0%59 of 790%1under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fundbox yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fundbox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00213

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative39 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Resolve or Fundbox.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B BNPL and terms · direct prompt · first choice
“more of an embedded financing / capital platform, but it can power net terms and installment options in B2B commerce” GPT-5.4 mini · B2B BNPL and terms · comparative prompt · alternative
“Fundbox offers robust B2B purchasing credits and Net Terms options for vendors” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B BNPL and terms · comparative prompt · alternative
“Alternatives if ineligible: Fundbox (revenue-based, ~600 FICO min)” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B BNPL and terms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Generally not recommended for mid-market due to very high APRs (80–240%+) and limited AR automation” Kimi K2 · B2B BNPL and terms · direct prompt · hard negative
“BBB complaint summary: 26 total complaints in the last 3 years... frustrations regarding unexpected automated payment system glitches and sudden strict restrictions on new credit line draws” Muse Glimmer 30B · B2B BNPL and terms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fundbox, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fundbox was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TreviPay22 of 396Not among the top eight
Two13 of 392Not among the top eight
Hokodo12 of 391Not among the top eight
Bluevine8 of 390Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fundbox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 39 answers that named Fundbox and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

resolvepay.com33
finder.com23
two.inc20
solidgate.com19
fintechspecs.com17
whop.com14
techrepublic.com13
infoseemedia.com11
order.co11
ratiotech.com11

172 of the 172 domain citations in answers naming Fundbox came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

fundbox.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fundbox takes 2% of first choices and Resolve Pay takes 56%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “b2b buy now pay later provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b bnpl and net terms providers”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
12,100 a month (“fundbox”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
156 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 19,441 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,701 · 188 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,604
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 7 of 90 in B2B BNPL and terms
Segment leader
56%
Resolve Pay
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
39 answers
Its own site cited
in 34 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on fundbox.com
288
subdomains included
Content
237
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 19
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog22132026-10-01Business banking
Podcast or video502024-09-14
Glossary or explainer402022-04-08
Comparison302020-10-13
News or press3undated
Template or tool102020-01-20
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fundbox.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Fundbox

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Fundbox is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Embedded Financing built for Platforms
For
Platforms
Customers named
Relay CapitalAutobooks CapitalEverCommerceAutobooksMr. Appliance FranchiseeThe Pie HoleFlux AccountingA Music Store
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Fundbox's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: fundbox.com, fundbox.com/blog/case-studies, fundbox.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fundbox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fundbox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fundbox by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Fundbox is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fundbox, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fundbox.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.