Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Gather.nexus · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Gather.nexus

15Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gather.nexus was named 4 times in Transfer pricing, where TPGenie led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business12 of 100

under the label threshold

Mid-market23 of 101

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In transfer pricing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Gather.nexus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Transfer pricing	Tax and compliance	0%	23 of 101	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Gather.nexus yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Gather.nexus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For very limited budgets (under $250/month): Go with t0 by Supernomial or GATHER.nexus” MiniMax M2.5 · Transfer pricing · budget prompt · alternative

“or GATHER.nexus at ~£150/month” Muse Glimmer 30B · Transfer pricing · budget prompt · alternative

“Starting Price: £150” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Transfer pricing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gather.nexus, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gather.nexus was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TPGenie7 of 154Not among the top eight

Exactera Transfer Pricing7 of 150Not among the top eight

t06 of 152Not among the top eight

PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing5 of 150Not among the top eight

Commenda4 of 152Not among the top eight

Fathom4 of 151Not among the top eight

Joiin3 of 151Not among the top eight

LiveFlow3 of 150Not among the top eight

ArmsLength AI2 of 150Not among the top eight

Cube2 of 150Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gather.nexus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Gather.nexus and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sourceforge.net14

gitnux.org9

capterra.com8

getsphere.com8

slashdot.org8

commenda.io7

itechguides.com7

topbusinesssoftware.com6

zipdo.co6

fathomhq.com5

Seventy-eight of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming Gather.nexus came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gitnux.org/best/transfer-pricing-software9

getsphere.com/blog/best-transfer-pricing-software-for-compliance8

itechguides.com/best/transfer-pricing-software7

slashdot.org/software/transfer-pricing7

sourceforge.net/software/transfer-pricing7

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-consolidation-software-solutions-in-20245

satvasolutions.com/blog/top-financial-consolidation-software5

slashdot.org/software/transfer-pricing/f-small-business5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

gather.nexus is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gather.nexus takes 0% of first choices and TPGenie takes 30%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “transfer pricing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “transfer pricing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“gather.nexus”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 2 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 35
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 101 in transfer pricing

Segment leader

30%

TPGenie

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 15 answers
Its own site cited: in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on gather.nexus

123

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 2

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	11	1	2026-08-04	Accounting software
Comparison	2	1	2026-09-09
News or press	1	0	2025-12-15

Most recent

2026-09-09Manual vs automated intercompany accounting comparison
2026-08-04Quickbooks online multi entity consolidation blog
2026-06-24Gather nexus for fractional cfos blog
2026-06-24Xero multi entity consolidation blog
2026-06-03Xero quickbooks multi entity consolidation blog
2026-06-02Intercompany accounting controls month end close blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page gather.nexus exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Gather.nexus

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gather.nexus; a claim can dispute any of them.

GATHER.nexus 4

Follow Gather.nexus

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Gather.nexus is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Multi-entity financial reporting & consolidation software, designed for Xero and QuickBooks users.
gather.nexus
For: Finance teams in businesses with a multi-entity corporate structure; particularly venture or PE backed scale-up businesses and Fractional CFOs.
gather.nexus
Price stated: Simple straightforward monthly pricing. Only pay for the modules you use and the number of Groups you manage gather.nexus
Starting price: 65 gather.nexus
Free plan or trial: 30 day Free Trial Period gather.nexus
Integrations claimed: 2 gather.nexus
Certifications: ISO 27001SOC 2GDPRPCI-DSS
Customers named: Directly Energy
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What Gather.nexus's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: gather.nexus, gather.nexus/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gather.nexus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gather.nexus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gather.nexus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Gather.nexus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gather.nexus, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.