Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 12 → 6 of 79
6 categories · RankedLiveFlow
95Judge labels
9First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in FP&A platforms for small business buyers
Rank 13 of 74 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LiveFlow →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 80
5%24 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market13 of 74
2%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise47 of 57
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In fp&a platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LiveFlow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 2% | 13 of 74 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 23 of 102 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 18 of 85 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 98 of 101 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 43 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 0% | 34 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Excel at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LiveFlow held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · FP&A platforms · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 17 → 12 of 73
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 44 of 54, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 23 of 102 |
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 13 of 74 |
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 18 of 85 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 98 of 101, unchanged |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 43 of 99 |
| Financial modeling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 34 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LiveFlow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LiveFlow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels3
Paraphrase12 labels1
Comparative12 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained32 labels5
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative18 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most budget-conscious companies, I'd start with Fathom or LiveFlow” GPT-5.4 mini · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“Lightweight, fast-to-implement tools that connect directly to standard SMB accounting software like QuickBooks Online or Xero.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
“For Excel-native teams: LiveFlow or Cube are popular because they work within Excel/Google Sheets” MiniMax M2.5 · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“lightweight reporting tools like LiveFlow if your biggest pain is reporting and visibility” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Tools to Be Cautious About: Management Reporting Platforms (Fathom, Reach Reporting, Spotlight Reporting, LiveFlow)” Mistral Small · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Reporting Platforms Masquerading as Forecasting Tools (e.g., ... LiveFlow)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LiveFlow, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LiveFlow was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LiveFlow, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LiveFlow was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LiveFlow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 95 of the 95 answers that named LiveFlow and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com45
learn.g2.com43
clockwork.ai39
cubesoftware.com36
drivetrain.ai28
golimelight.com26
datarails.com22
fathomhq.com22
prophix.com22
getaleph.com21
304 of the 304 domain citations in answers naming LiveFlow came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
liveflow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LiveFlow takes 2% of first choices and Planful takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
liveflow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LiveFlow takes 2% of first choices and Planful takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “fp&a software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “fp&a platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“liveflow”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 19 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 94,846 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 24,585 · 976 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 766
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 74 in FP&A platforms
Segment leader
20%
Planful
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 95 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 95 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on liveflow.com
1,497
subdomains included
Content
583
counted in the table below
Documentation
208
Product · Integration
9 · 24
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 267 | 96 | 2026-09-29 | Financial consolidation | |
| Blog | 214 | 16 | 2026-09-29 | Accounting software, Financial consolidation | |
| Comparison | 60 | 35 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 24 | 15 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 14 | 11 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Template category google sheet blog
- 2026-09-29Template category microsoft excel blog
- 2026-09-29Google sheets web app link blog
- 2026-09-29Excel web app link blog
- 2026-09-29Liveflow vs jirav comparison
- 2026-09-29Liveflow vs datarails comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page liveflow.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name accounting software (10); 6 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as LiveFlow
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LiveFlow; a claim can dispute any of them.
LiveFlow FP&A 2
Follow LiveFlow
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LiveFlow is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LiveFlow is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Agentic Accounting Platform
- For
- growing, multi-entity businesses
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2GDPR
- Hosting
- US
- Customers named
- Y CombinatorOpenPhoneKalshiSlashCleoRize EducationETS PerformanceLupus Research Alliance
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What LiveFlow's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: liveflow.com, liveflow.com/pricing, trust.liveflow.com, liveflow.com/features/payables, liveflow.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LiveFlow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LiveFlow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LiveFlow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LiveFlow is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LiveFlow, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.