Index › Products › HaloPSA · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

HaloPSA

17Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HaloPSA was named 7 times in PSA, where BigTime led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business22 of 97

under the label threshold

Mid-market18 of 99

under the label threshold

Enterprise84 of 109

under the label threshold

In psa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HaloPSA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Professional services automation	Receivables and billing	0%	18 of 99	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HaloPSA yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HaloPSA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Look for modern, lightweight alternatives (like *Productive*, *HaloPSA*, *Ruddr*, or *Rocketlane*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PSA · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose HaloPSA if: You're a growing MSP that wants modern automation without legacy complexity.” Kimi K2 · PSA · comparative prompt · alternative

“HaloPSA and SuperOps are also excellent choices, especially for IT services and MSPs.” Mistral Small · PSA · budget prompt · alternative

“If you are troubleshooting high-volume tech tickets, go with ConnectWise or HaloPSA.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PSA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“HaloPSA's configuration burden is frequently underestimated” Muse Glimmer 30B · PSA · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HaloPSA, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HaloPSA was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Scoro12 of 170Not among the top eight

Kantata10 of 171Not among the top eight

Certinia Professional Services Cloud10 of 170Not among the top eight

BigTime9 of 174Not among the top eight

ConnectWise PSA8 of 170Not among the top eight

Rocketlane7 of 171Not among the top eight

SuperOps7 of 171Not among the top eight

Accelo7 of 170Not among the top eight

Syncro7 of 170Not among the top eight

Teamwork.com6 of 171Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HaloPSA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named HaloPSA and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kantata.com11

scoro.com11

g2.com10

bigtime.net9

rocketlane.com7

teamwork.com7

uplandsoftware.com7

guideflow.com6

learn.g2.com6

zeeg.me6

No domain is on file for HaloPSA, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

kantata.com/blog/article/best-professional-services-automation-software10

scoro.com/blog/psa-software-examples10

uplandsoftware.com/psa/professional-services-automation/best-psa-software7

bigtime.net/blogs/what-is-psa-software6

guideflow.com/blog/professional-services-automation-software6

learn.g2.com/best-professional-services-automation-software6

zeeg.me/en/blog/post/professional-services-automation-software6

ruddr.com/post/top-professional-services-automation-psa-platforms-for-20265

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where HaloPSA stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 1,600 a month (“halopsa”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 29 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 18 of 99 in PSA

Segment leader

29%

BigTime

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 17 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow HaloPSA

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HaloPSA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HaloPSA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HaloPSA by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where HaloPSA is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name HaloPSA, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.