2 categories · RankedTeamwork.com
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional services automation | Receivables and billing | 6% | 5 of 99 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 83 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Teamwork.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need the cheapest viable PSA with time tracking + invoicing, Teamwork.com from ~$9.99/user/mo and BigTime Essentials from ~$20/user/mo are the most frequently cited budget-friendly options” Muse Glimmer 30B · PSA · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive (starting at $9/user/month) or Teamwork.com ... offer the best overall value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PSA · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive or Teamwork are the top picks” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PSA · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Teamwork if you need a user-friendly tool that your non-finance staff will actually enjoy using daily.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PSA · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Teamwork.com, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teamwork.com was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named Teamwork.com and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
113 of the 139 domain citations in answers naming Teamwork.com came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
teamwork.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Teamwork.com takes 6% of first choices and BigTime takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“teamwork.com”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 23 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 467,278 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 15,272 · 1,520 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,961
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 35 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 35 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 642 | 10 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 159 | 0 | 2024-09-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 135 | 0 | 2024-07-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 79 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | ||
| Case study | 68 | 0 | 2025-07-11 | ||
| Comparison | 55 | 3 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 52 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 52 | 0 | 2024-10-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2023-07-05 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2024-01-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Cost to serve blog
- 2026-09-25How to bill a client blog
- 2026-09-25How to choose a billing model blog
- 2026-09-25Smartsheet alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-24Margin erosion professional services blog
- 2026-09-24Pipeline to project handoff blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page teamwork.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Teamwork.com
Follow Teamwork.com
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Teamwork.com is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered PSA software built for profitability; the agentic PSA that helps you win, plan and deliver projects, with live margin at every step.
- For
- professional services businesses
- Price stated
- Straightforward pricing, built for professional services: Basics €9.99 /user/month billed yearly; Accelerate €24.99 /user/month billed yearly; Optimize Custom pricing; Enterprise Custom pricing. teamwork.com
- Starting price
- 9.99 teamwork.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14 DAY TRIAL. NO CREDIT CARD REQUIRED teamwork.com
- Integrations claimed
- 150 teamwork.com
- Certifications
- GDPRSOC 2ISO 27001SSOSSO standardsSOC 2 compliance
- Hosting
- USEU
- Customers named
- OIC advisorsCLC consultingSugarCRMThreeSixtyEightInvanityThe Brand LeaderBeyond the ChaosInvanity Marketing
What Teamwork.com's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: teamwork.com, teamwork.com, teamwork.com/pricing, trust.teamwork.com, teamwork.com/product. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teamwork.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teamwork.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Teamwork.com by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Teamwork.com is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Teamwork.com, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.