Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 34 → 24 of 82
1 category · Named, not rankedHedgeFlows
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HedgeFlows was named 2 times in Cross-border payments, where Wise Business led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market25 of 87
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In cross-border payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HedgeFlows for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-border payments and FX | Treasury and cash | 0% | 25 of 87 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 39% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HedgeFlows held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Cross-border payments · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-border payments | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 25 of 87 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HedgeFlows across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HedgeFlows across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“HedgeFlows integrates with Xero, NetSuite, QuickBooks and Dynamics in minutes” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Fast Implementation & Simplicity: HedgeFlows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HedgeFlows, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HedgeFlows was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HedgeFlows, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HedgeFlows was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HedgeFlows. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named HedgeFlows and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
apideck.com2
hedgeflows.comYour site2
highradius.com2
agicap.com1
alt21.com1
bancoli.com1
bill.com1
blog.corphedge.com1
businessage.com1
cbinsights.com1
Eleven of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming HedgeFlows came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hedgeflows.com
239
subdomains included
Content
145
counted in the table below
Documentation
32
Product · Integration
9 · 7
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 83 | 0 | 2026-03-23 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 49 | undated | |||
| Case study | 8 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-21 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2025-08-06 |
Most recent
- 2026-03-23The safe haven that wasn t what the gilt yield shock means for your business blog
- 2026-03-21Multi currency treasury platform guide report or ebook
- 2026-03-16Middle east conflict what it means for businesses trading internationally blog
- 2025-11-18The fx blindspot costing millions in budget planning blog
- 2025-10-03Why ai in finance is following the same bumpy road as autonomous vehicles blog
- 2025-10-03Treasury management report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hedgeflows.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow HedgeFlows
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HedgeFlows is its own company.ShowHide
The company
HedgeFlows is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- FCA-regulated treasury advisory and technology platform for mid-market international businesses.
- For
- mid-market international businesses
- Price stated
- Plans from free to enterprise. hedgeflows.com
- Starting price
- 0 hedgeflows.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial available. hedgeflows.com
- Integrations claimed
- 4 hedgeflows.com/pricing · 2000 hedgeflows.com/platform pages disagree
- Certifications
- FCA AuthorisationFCA Regulatedauthorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as an Authorised Payment Institution (Firm Reference Number: 1008699)authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 (Firm Reference Number: 1008699)registered with the Financial Conduct Authority under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 for the purpose of money laundering supervision
- Customers named
- Michal JahnsJourneySophie DaleJoannaPangeaNick CurranMohammad OmoushChris Standeven
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What HedgeFlows's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: hedgeflows.com, hedgeflows.com/pricing, hedgeflows.com/platform, hedgeflows.com/case-studies, hedgeflows.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HedgeFlows's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HedgeFlows, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HedgeFlows by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HedgeFlows is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HedgeFlows, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.